Re: [DNSOP] Verifying errata 5316 against RFC1034.
Matthew Pounsett <matt@conundrum.com> Tue, 03 April 2018 00:12 UTC
Return-Path: <matt@conundrum.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14AFA127076 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Apr 2018 17:12:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=conundrum-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z0ENR9cQTv88 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Apr 2018 17:12:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x233.google.com (mail-io0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FC8B12D889 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Apr 2018 17:12:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x233.google.com with SMTP id o4so19848712iod.3 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 02 Apr 2018 17:12:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=conundrum-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=vI0AynsH5Ro20bAzi9guTke0SqSYEv+vnxFSQeI4DHM=; b=LpfNzW2Prf6EyC2U5fhPWDPG5QLw+2RRsSiqXQFi5QODnpsSEoDk4MJhZU2bXVWoPc PUbl0xOY+iMgQ1osQM9IiF6ZThJfksZxXvOLWPaACvOw+ASLNjUfRPce5saZCKmCeq6U QtsDchtbDjCHY//wB1i1G27YDjuS+UKN7Kn9AvT544GXjfyNUQDgXWqThndyJepjo9+c Vy1USurAIp28xc8BqtrBahtKT74Ghs89rSHPoq1skMzm8bejoDowhm1RmgDWz5ReX4Tg UQU5x9M/UhUQaddUDD2CICwGSNNyUn5WrjQAuQCwuY1SO2MP/QGLIiMIVbR8eGe9TKWi m9Fg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=vI0AynsH5Ro20bAzi9guTke0SqSYEv+vnxFSQeI4DHM=; b=Nn0bvs1pnRwR2Z3zccsDbWZXF9GkQd2WesCtCt8EU8Y0cD/Xy+8kQt0c4iiL49eC0I Ci0W0wfj8djknZz1Ih8JXeh8Yd8/A4CX22q50VxRjASf+iwB/NGf/LWlKbL5Z6uYM6eo MYEyxEmk/i+VAeOireWBPaOIfdxHiNAdcGNwA2oJ0vio2JLtSjorX6st4cEuqEV8N4a7 OVw8iLWLVvFhbuuMrY2iqQvPn7p7K5TcJgRNwQnhCG586Rdm2f9k4HzVck8mtsbhFr4L FIY74tn4r0q9cuZt+fL0mjVQz+e3ggoU/Slm87f7i8ErnA1sb8IEEo5xU0QhCOqWfgzr s5Lw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tAy8fUgk9pW932WlKbyjmbifhLTvP4vTIy1kbjH3hsHsH4uuFv+ FvPdT8VTwopjJZXO5pz36EFVKfRbcsq0JzO2ngk7Nw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx49/ksAbpqPQXyi+9rH3+hHXU9p1sXzN2A8UMGfsZR0KVzsyRrpasHvEW1w6G2hmZw0uMzZoxxkmBb0CcEQWB7g=
X-Received: by 10.107.10.99 with SMTP id u96mr10860414ioi.152.1522714325390; Mon, 02 Apr 2018 17:12:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.2.112.197 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Apr 2018 17:12:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_iJtZxrdW-c7FgkdyWR-NHPOUrxpD3V43CSci32UGr_irA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHw9_iJugi-bucEqLA=wsgf5J7C7BDN2zqHsNeHuckx2QAkpiw@mail.gmail.com> <20180401210619.GA75012@isc.org> <CAHw9_iJtZxrdW-c7FgkdyWR-NHPOUrxpD3V43CSci32UGr_irA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Matthew Pounsett <matt@conundrum.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2018 20:12:04 -0400
Message-ID: <CAAiTEH-=_nbCeAhqpULT95W7vxWMM_goa+w5yNr+qAgAo9=SUQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Cc: Evan Hunt <each@isc.org>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113eec2e75c4ab0568e68e84"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/L5NikGwS7412AThL86M_2t6Bb5A>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Verifying errata 5316 against RFC1034.
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2018 00:12:08 -0000
On 2 April 2018 at 09:56, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> wrote: > > This is not clearly a modification to the intended consensus (yet), > and currently feels unclear to me, so I'm going to give this another > few days (~1 week) and then, probably, mark it Hold for Document > Update. I'd still appreciate peoples' views and comments on if this is > correct. > > Hold for Document Update seems like the right choice to me. I don't think it's proper Errata for the reasons already mentioned, and as we're already discussing maybe obsoleting 1035 with a rewrite, Hold seems more prudent than Reject.
- [DNSOP] Verifying errata 5316 against RFC1034. Warren Kumari
- Re: [DNSOP] Verifying errata 5316 against RFC1034. Mukund Sivaraman
- Re: [DNSOP] Verifying errata 5316 against RFC1034. Evan Hunt
- Re: [DNSOP] Verifying errata 5316 against RFC1034. bert hubert
- Re: [DNSOP] Verifying errata 5316 against RFC1034. Warren Kumari
- Re: [DNSOP] Verifying errata 5316 against RFC1034. Matthew Pounsett
- Re: [DNSOP] Verifying errata 5316 against RFC1034. Warren Kumari