IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Verifying errata 5316 against RFC1034.

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Mon, 09 April 2018 14:36 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28CEE126DED for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Apr 2018 07:36:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.711
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.711 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 383aq4eHZ9mr for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Apr 2018 07:36:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x236.google.com (mail-wm0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6171A126C25 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Apr 2018 07:36:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x236.google.com with SMTP id w2so17969983wmw.1 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 09 Apr 2018 07:36:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=DMcM2xuQiLD6iXJWWUS36tQb7ACOrvPMZfO8o7leEDE=; b=SETVEnMkq+SRNW+1vBgiFvDFd/B+vvJUtv54P63LYwDUtyPIU0qllcFqUABeQYfJiL VtvP77Q1+SQbseu/s0N/DyypKZlwrHqLetzs5ty77JaQiF652RAhe9KSzGoxqSkD6snO uEOeUWsX40l3osW7+F1WtyH3+lQ/qd+7lKkq+8pxtfYfbCKFizcIEJCbW3tY1pkhe2M5 UFLjnUZVKhL6jfKnaGZ0DADNazh4wcoJOzcSO+jGlpDCgfF575bv1El3ap4GuLr8QVKt AayslOCfmekK0ISIMZ646Bt0sCRS59T8Wp5HBHMh9bUhE/m+D89RPofnJ2tedNAzFlnz gPsw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=DMcM2xuQiLD6iXJWWUS36tQb7ACOrvPMZfO8o7leEDE=; b=aCoTIMbvzkzV18l8qMa8zYHnf4p7tY02zhGSTSpKYXKDQGeAZDD8nd4DMMlyy/OA24 P8u1K1dcemNeJzU2xXaD7Z5zlobF3e+BDwVH5Kvl0VaHqNyBXzmOCxS/NUHX1xxX2Yrj vORnAgbXdiTm9REdHj7AdukawPBq4Gj7yMNpAqFIN/sU56Ou7cYN58OdzpQ4dlX2AN+B 29qc/1+0K6cdkeZPdkO2DPQRVM357HKSryoXkRrvXIK/2Nzq6SOVts13ZKsevZwAee9i 1tY8b11aYXemf49lW/4XQHsKwcUQxtA21t6kgGaJxI1QSaOAxi79rv65YGjTe3APKwLv LuRg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tAxoY2J8Wjh0qeoS1DaHXovLQO2Jr3pXwOhgcF4MDZI3FauNGTl sEA5p0FQfUtnFSrcZMJhC4DxIlcsQLEBSmWssXEgcKfK
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx48BJnn8Z5BVCj8WQE14VMyXE8XtbL0OyBsbC113fdVnGnEXWESBpOs2GXCR8BtXSMcklrZV0FVCrvEk6Fqiq/M=
X-Received: by 10.28.142.1 with SMTP id q1mr214970wmd.0.1523284594033; Mon, 09 Apr 2018 07:36:34 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.226.76 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Apr 2018 07:35:53 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAAiTEH-=_nbCeAhqpULT95W7vxWMM_goa+w5yNr+qAgAo9=SUQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHw9_iJugi-bucEqLA=wsgf5J7C7BDN2zqHsNeHuckx2QAkpiw@mail.gmail.com> <20180401210619.GA75012@isc.org> <CAHw9_iJtZxrdW-c7FgkdyWR-NHPOUrxpD3V43CSci32UGr_irA@mail.gmail.com> <CAAiTEH-=_nbCeAhqpULT95W7vxWMM_goa+w5yNr+qAgAo9=SUQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2018 10:35:53 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHw9_iKnmQCLZ+wXCwOPHVUWxOLjLskdS36r-xAgdcuKUUDAtA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Matthew Pounsett <matt@conundrum.com>
Cc: Evan Hunt <each@isc.org>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/6crUvz2U2iWSoNNXyG_MYGoW4oo>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Verifying errata 5316 against RFC1034.
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2018 14:36:38 -0000

On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 8:12 PM, Matthew Pounsett <matt@conundrum.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 2 April 2018 at 09:56, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>> This is not clearly a modification to the intended consensus (yet),
>> and currently feels unclear to me, so I'm going to give this another
>> few days (~1 week) and then, probably, mark it Hold for Document
>> Update. I'd still appreciate peoples' views and comments on if this is
>> correct.

One week is up, and I posted it as Hold for Document Update.

Thanks everyone for your review and advice.

W

>>
> Hold for Document Update seems like the right choice to me.  I don't think
> it's proper Errata for the reasons already mentioned, and as we're already
> discussing maybe obsoleting 1035 with a rewrite, Hold seems more prudent
> than Reject.
>




-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.
   ---maf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email