IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Some distinctions and a request - Have some class?

manning <bmanning@karoshi.com> Fri, 03 July 2015 18:11 UTC

Return-Path: <bmanning@karoshi.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A8F51A8A57 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 11:11:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xdM6_fD5yRWx for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 11:11:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vacation.karoshi.com (vacation.karoshi.com [198.32.6.68]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 329251A89FE for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 11:11:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vacation.karoshi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F05DA17E2A; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 11:11:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at karoshi.com
Received: from vacation.karoshi.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (vacation.karoshi.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sTRmwcFu8mBE; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 11:11:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [198.32.4.206] (unknown [198.32.4.206]) by vacation.karoshi.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 164AFA17E20; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 11:11:20 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
From: manning <bmanning@karoshi.com>
In-Reply-To: <23A02478-6E3C-4B59-AEC5-C300A5F9DF40@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2015 11:11:23 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B1587D70-D30F-4FD6-AAB7-AC8AAE8FB1DB@karoshi.com>
References: <6CB05D82CE245B4083BBF3B97E2ED470C27498@ait-pex01mbx01.win.dtu.dk> <D1BAA21E.CA2E%edward.lewis@icann.org> <6CB05D82CE245B4083BBF3B97E2ED470C2759F@ait-pex01mbx01.win.dtu.dk> <6CB05D82CE245B4083BBF3B97E2ED470C275B2@ait-pex01mbx01.win.dtu.dk> <E225C721-7279-4053-97A2-2D63A155DA14@karoshi.com> <6CB05D82CE245B4083BBF3B97E2ED470C27602@ait-pex01mbx01.win.dtu.dk> <88E49F4B-64BD-4832-BD02-D1A882874E92@karoshi.com> <20150702234423.GB23022@mycre.ws> <EBDBDD70-046F-4E31-BDAC-A619EECD4F13@karoshi.com> <20150703012146.GA29948@mycre.ws> <DC13E07F-2203-4FE9-A67F-B5851A54298F@karoshi.com> <986E07DA-B174-4F81-BFB5-F5EAD46C506F@karoshi.com> <CAHw9_iJMZzrCM24gaMJpDNTHbKwF20DeVX7UszCMZuUvGnLaXw@mail.gmail.com> <BB0813DF-DF9D-4CD9-BDB8-26A437146986@karoshi.com> <1A6EA045-998D-487D-821C-D96716756F91@frobbit.se> <23A02478-6E3C-4B59-AEC5-C300A5F9DF40@gmail.com>
To: Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/5n4PLUXAxp1ulTGk4BQPqvueDVs>
Cc: Robert Edmonds <edmonds@mycre.ws>, dnsop@ietf.org, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Some distinctions and a request - Have some class?
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2015 18:11:40 -0000

On 3July2015Friday, at 9:26, Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> It does seem to me that an important feature here is that "TLD" as we're using it is "name in the root zone (or root zone space), to be managed within a context that assumes DNS protocol and semantics as well as DNS-compatible name space." (That is, people using the term "TLD" to refer to single-label DNS-compatible name are incorrect-- "onion" is not a TLD, and that's largely the point.)

CHAOS names are DNS-compatible. But they are not anchored in the root of the Internet class.

I guess my question here is, what would prevent House Finch Feathers OY from applying for the DNS(IN) string ONION from ICANN because they want that as a TLD in the IN class?

I will not be able to attend the DNSOPS WG since I arrive in Prague later in the week, but would appreciate being part of this ongoing discussion.


/bill

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email