Re: [DNSOP] Some distinctions and a request - Have some class?

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Sun, 05 July 2015 00:35 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 176E01B2AB6 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 4 Jul 2015 17:35:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hLY_qVz6CtzT for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 4 Jul 2015 17:35:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx2.yitter.info (mx2.yitter.info [IPv6:2600:3c03::f03c:91ff:fedf:cfab]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEEA51B2AB5 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sat, 4 Jul 2015 17:35:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2525910370 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 5 Jul 2015 00:35:17 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at crankycanuck.ca
Received: from mx2.yitter.info ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx2.yitter.info [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uCpXpehq41mx for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 5 Jul 2015 00:35:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx2.yitter.info (unknown [IPv6:2601:18d:8600:22:886:ea8d:b9e1:1469]) by mx2.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 41D0C1000B for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 5 Jul 2015 00:35:16 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2015 20:35:14 -0400
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20150705003514.GD48722@mx2.yitter.info>
References: <6CB05D82CE245B4083BBF3B97E2ED470C2759F@ait-pex01mbx01.win.dtu.dk> <6CB05D82CE245B4083BBF3B97E2ED470C275B2@ait-pex01mbx01.win.dtu.dk> <E225C721-7279-4053-97A2-2D63A155DA14@karoshi.com> <6CB05D82CE245B4083BBF3B97E2ED470C27602@ait-pex01mbx01.win.dtu.dk> <88E49F4B-64BD-4832-BD02-D1A882874E92@karoshi.com> <20150702234423.GB23022@mycre.ws> <EBDBDD70-046F-4E31-BDAC-A619EECD4F13@karoshi.com> <20150703012146.GA29948@mycre.ws> <DC13E07F-2203-4FE9-A67F-B5851A54298F@karoshi.com> <986E07DA-B174-4F81-BFB5-F5EAD46C506F@karoshi.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <986E07DA-B174-4F81-BFB5-F5EAD46C506F@karoshi.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/h1M4HKDa3lYF6g-1T841P75Z75Q>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Some distinctions and a request - Have some class?
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2015 00:35:19 -0000

On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 06:43:13AM -0700, manning wrote:
> Actually, there IS an escape method already defined.  We just don’t use it much these days.
> It’s called  “class”

Classes don't work in the general case, because CNAME (and following
it, DNAME) is class-independent.  This is arguably a bug in the
protocol, but it's a fact nevertheless.  As a result, different
classes aren't really different namespaces.

Best regards,

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com