IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last call for draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-error-reporting

Roy Arends <roy@dnss.ec> Tue, 20 June 2023 22:58 UTC

Return-Path: <roy@dnss.ec>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F6EDC151522 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Jun 2023 15:58:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=dnss.ec
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5RNEP53AyZM8 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Jun 2023 15:58:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x72a.google.com (mail-qk1-x72a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AE35C15107F for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Jun 2023 15:58:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x72a.google.com with SMTP id af79cd13be357-763bd31d223so33593685a.3 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Jun 2023 15:58:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dnss.ec; s=google; t=1687301885; x=1689893885; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=rRLJXeHAbFyCjr8PTWcpGaDKl50W51yqj67lCDiJrfw=; b=Sh0unl2uWR2op7om3+PQrCW6kR2/WKNmDXOzLeqypZZnrDg37KjOJ0jZ8kLDD+ga8A hTX7F1FuS0oVUYhlUBOTyMRryvVLyVIyw7u4kU4pt2xUMyxyXHVP2NKeKcTbRrIPv19J eTgjptXrMDJ3rmfflTwPO+HU2dyDlC/CHDb/g=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1687301885; x=1689893885; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=rRLJXeHAbFyCjr8PTWcpGaDKl50W51yqj67lCDiJrfw=; b=O8J9NLFBUi9Xx73CqiXV6x3H0is1S9iJCHHi72fSXST2iucWnv3qKPhqrhRvG9C/t1 wu32D4zMxIpdUf0EzbCIdDjff65ZwGSwhtcQV8IYNTNIswLdqBH87WbYiIo0WADzBwOa RE2oS49Y7CESkSyXHvUPamTfDOHP68qp/RzPd5rIOK7LG8bjXzbIa21dGm+cPxg2ur9s NQA03dFYhXPZ4EJbg+SEniij+uTgGakoCgv1li50z3zAadXoIkDx5qoKzanjHanbKPP4 eK6OXpaM8u7oiYFmTtUvDu3QnjpsQbUkh163WaGAsoFQ62ro0JEnjaN0JcXZ+ZtjVZGJ IX4A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDzhvgD14VORUnbXRTfDgOmCCCEclBcvESq+ocYdW3AmNQBDw0ym cm+U+aLTQZIPaIj+akBGog5nsQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ6k0EL0RYPKdG+T6F/C7tSHGr0F9fpSpPeZjY1tpqzLCRrogTNLIfvZmT6f1F5dYAiW36VZdA==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:f01:b0:625:87e4:1689 with SMTP id gw1-20020a0562140f0100b0062587e41689mr18194881qvb.20.1687301885120; Tue, 20 Jun 2023 15:58:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([89.33.15.144]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i19-20020a0cf493000000b0062623d8ab7esm1732786qvm.111.2023.06.20.15.58.03 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 20 Jun 2023 15:58:04 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.600.7\))
From: Roy Arends <roy@dnss.ec>
In-Reply-To: <CAKW6Ri7HBG1KvDtf15vLsn8vqKbHZ6LtzUAU86RLgb4+m1YZpA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2023 23:57:48 +0100
Cc: Willem Toorop <willem@nlnetlabs.nl>, Benno Overeinder <benno@nlnetlabs.nl>, DNSOP Working Group <dnsop@ietf.org>, DNSOP Chairs <dnsop-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <14B39D5F-4E55-488C-AB79-0D4407FD3255@dnss.ec>
References: <fa6ec641-0eab-dec6-2267-3ca818402812@NLnetLabs.nl> <49112d32-e0c7-0ee0-9bdb-b1379fc8e7ce@nlnetlabs.nl> <395A2004-803E-43CA-945E-F9C1EDE86F21@dnss.ec> <CAKW6Ri6BnA1xpmQLpwepBDCZa=G0FnD-QtBqqskLc9NaOn3n8w@mail.gmail.com> <62DB4990-C49F-46C6-9A72-EBFACFB835B4@dnss.ec> <CAKW6Ri7HBG1KvDtf15vLsn8vqKbHZ6LtzUAU86RLgb4+m1YZpA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dick Franks <rwfranks@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.600.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/5z8h1wOTGrNpFA1VlKI0e_iwd0g>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last call for draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-error-reporting
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2023 22:58:11 -0000


> On 20 Jun 2023, at 23:35, Dick Franks <rwfranks@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 20 Jun 2023 at 22:20, Roy Arends <roy@dnss.ec> wrote:
>> 8
> 
>> 
>> The change was from -03 to -04 and discussed in the WG IIRC. The specific sentence your refer to was a lingering oversight in the changes from -03 to -04. I have consulted many developers on this, and so far I had no push back.
>> 
>>> explicitly querying the authoritative server for the appropriate
>>> report channel to a dependence on authoritatives attaching an
>>> (unsolicited) EDNS0 report channel option to each and every query.
>> 
>> No.
>> 
>> An authoritative server includes the option if configured to do so AND if it has the a non-null domain name configured as the reporting channel. It will then reply to each query. This is IMHO better than having a resolver include the option each and every time. Note that resolvers will ignore options that are unknown to them.
> 
> 6.2.  Authoritative server specification
> Contains not a shred of normative language saying any of that.
> 
> The preliminary waffle in the overview could apply to either the
> solicited or unsolicited regime.
> 
>>> I withdraw my earlier statement that the document is almost ready.
>>> Now, clearly it is not.
>> 
>> I hear you. I do not agree though, and I hope you reconsider
> Not without further work

Please send text.

Roy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email