IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last call for draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-error-reporting

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Wed, 21 June 2023 13:08 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB392C14F747; Wed, 21 Jun 2023 06:08:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ktWSGRwHbLOI; Wed, 21 Jun 2023 06:08:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [193.110.157.85]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 026BFC14F73E; Wed, 21 Jun 2023 06:08:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4QmP2H3wKTz3W2; Wed, 21 Jun 2023 15:08:23 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1687352903; bh=53U5kNduwPEs/SMvJmgVv5ygLfnTEuugmQgm1GZNMss=; h=From:Subject:Date:References:Cc:In-Reply-To:To; b=Wy/zPOvgsEgeNbgLyHOoj1F2q1tdheDCrzx+tazNVKCYr32G6u8xkzdkb302eu+eZ QdmOygolKBNot6fntnthrRwVBxmvF65eEuimvypkmyB0XHbVQvYCyH1LqBtybTjJI2 MN6G/GjoX4Gz62BTMTkwLcCG1EQwrVMZIxsM+YYA=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VvgCxYwk0q4u; Wed, 21 Jun 2023 15:08:22 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [193.110.157.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Wed, 21 Jun 2023 15:08:22 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [193.110.157.208]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 78F4D1012599; Wed, 21 Jun 2023 09:08:21 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2023 09:07:52 -0400
Message-Id: <D7DB2C7B-0CDD-443E-BE32-14F5D04389B9@nohats.ca>
References: <CAKW6Ri6BnA1xpmQLpwepBDCZa=G0FnD-QtBqqskLc9NaOn3n8w@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Roy Arends <roy@dnss.ec>, Willem Toorop <willem@nlnetlabs.nl>, Benno Overeinder <benno@nlnetlabs.nl>, DNSOP Working Group <dnsop@ietf.org>, DNSOP Chairs <dnsop-chairs@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAKW6Ri6BnA1xpmQLpwepBDCZa=G0FnD-QtBqqskLc9NaOn3n8w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dick Franks <rwfranks@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (20C65)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/xF994cr9U9RcQLza5grGNdnJcwc>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last call for draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-error-reporting
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2023 13:08:30 -0000

On Jun 20, 2023, at 16:40, Dick Franks <rwfranks@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> WGLC is supposed to be a review, nit-picking and clarification process.

A “review” can have results requiring major changes. But your use here seems to imply “only small changes”. This is incorrect. 

Documents in WGLC could be found to have problems requiring more work in the WG to resolve. It could be abandoned or largely changed but b response to comments and issues raised.

Similar actions could happen during IETF LC and IESG review.

Unfortunately, these days a lot of people in various WGs see the WGLC as a deadline to _start_ reading a document for the first time. This increases the risks of WGLC documents needing more work and having issues exposed later in the process than we would like.

Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email