IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] DNS privacy and AS 112: the case of home.arpa

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Mon, 18 December 2017 14:16 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9167512711E for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 06:16:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7kWTJcLlMube for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 06:16:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (mx4.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:2::4:12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A1B512708C for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 06:16:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id CBE2328211A; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 15:16:47 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix, from userid 500) id C4EE0282260; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 15:16:47 +0100 (CET)
Received: from relay01.prive.nic.fr (relay01.prive.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:15::11]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDFEC28211A; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 15:16:47 +0100 (CET)
Received: from b12.nic.fr (b12.tech.ipv6.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:1348:7::86:133]) by relay01.prive.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA80F642A7A1; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 15:16:47 +0100 (CET)
Received: by b12.nic.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B395B401D4; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 15:16:47 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 15:16:47 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
Cc: Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>, Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>, dnsop@ietf.org, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-ID: <20171218141647.3t7in2trpa5sv76r@nic.fr>
References: <20171211090051.qjoruin7nkdjsnvd@nic.fr> <5A2E4B7C.50509@redbarn.org> <20171211091800.wonjnvhl3xrx6r4s@nic.fr> <118C37A8-0DEF-460B-8A79-AAE470D3CED8@hopcount.ca> <1B37BBA1-D141-441A-855E-1ACFF2DC15BD@fugue.com> <EC253232-3713-426E-9300-20AE38C8BE4F@hopcount.ca> <23CF8A88-F530-426D-A6A9-4B80AF28D603@fugue.com> <09515131-DD1B-4FC9-90F6-C088173857BA@hopcount.ca> <D49204C6-6DCA-4991-9DDF-0915AF913BBB@isc.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <D49204C6-6DCA-4991-9DDF-0915AF913BBB@isc.org>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 9.2
X-Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-3-amd64 x86_64
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.2
X-PMX-Version: 6.0.0.2142326, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2017.12.18.140316
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/AnYo8LvCL23SEwQOQzXJIsIGm9A>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] DNS privacy and AS 112: the case of home.arpa
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 14:16:52 -0000

On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 12:53:30PM +1100,
 Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> wrote 
 a message of 41 lines which said:

> Also IANA was NOT instructed to delegate to the AS112 servers.  IANA
> was instructed to delegate to back hole servers and a example of
> which, the AS112 servers, was presented.

I understand it is precisely one of the problems Joe Abley mentioned:
AS 112 servers are not really black hole servers (they reply).

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email