IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] DNS privacy and AS 112: the case of home.arpa

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Wed, 13 December 2017 10:33 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A47A126BF0 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 02:33:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vIQBndcMGLvm for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 02:33:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.bortzmeyer.org (aetius.bortzmeyer.org [IPv6:2001:4b98:dc0:41:216:3eff:fece:1902]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E76AE1241F3 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 02:33:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail.bortzmeyer.org (Postfix, from userid 10) id CF78731CBA; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 11:33:06 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail.sources.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id AEAB5190888; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 11:29:02 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 11:29:02 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Kim Davies <kim.davies@iana.org>
Cc: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>, dnsop@ietf.org, Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>, Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>
Message-ID: <20171213102902.d4lypaz3azyvfylf@sources.org>
References: <20171211090051.qjoruin7nkdjsnvd@nic.fr> <5A2E4B7C.50509@redbarn.org> <20171211091800.wonjnvhl3xrx6r4s@nic.fr> <118C37A8-0DEF-460B-8A79-AAE470D3CED8@hopcount.ca> <73B3C074-6B88-4BCC-8F0C-26D09066CD0A@isc.org> <20171211231643.GA73777@KIDA-6861.local>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20171211231643.GA73777@KIDA-6861.local>
X-Transport: UUCP rules
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 9.1
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/IlJUgiy2iuTnUWzyIgMw1hkwcLk>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] DNS privacy and AS 112: the case of home.arpa
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 10:33:11 -0000

On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 03:16:46PM -0800,
 Kim Davies <kim.davies@iana.org> wrote 
 a message of 22 lines which said:

> the delegation to AS112 was considered as the best short-term
> approach even if it is not without its own difficulties.

Interesting information, thanks.

But the original question was about privacy. Was it considered or do
people in charge felt it was, as Paul Vixie mentioned, a false problem
here?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email