IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] DNS privacy and AS 112: the case of home.arpa

Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org> Mon, 11 December 2017 09:26 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@redbarn.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6B0D128796 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 01:26:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oTCSMRQyindJ for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 01:26:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from family.redbarn.org (family.redbarn.org [24.104.150.213]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 927B31200F3 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 01:26:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:559:8000:c9:dc3:59e3:1fa5:69dc] (unknown [IPv6:2001:559:8000:c9:dc3:59e3:1fa5:69dc]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by family.redbarn.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4E15B61FA2; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 09:26:29 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <5A2E4F43.9050401@redbarn.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 01:26:27 -0800
From: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
User-Agent: Postbox 5.0.20 (Windows/20171012)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
CC: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <20171211090051.qjoruin7nkdjsnvd@nic.fr> <5A2E4B7C.50509@redbarn.org> <20171211091800.wonjnvhl3xrx6r4s@nic.fr>
In-Reply-To: <20171211091800.wonjnvhl3xrx6r4s@nic.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/fk9TKGnQqWOUz7qFCsEs6KivM80>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] DNS privacy and AS 112: the case of home.arpa
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 09:26:31 -0000


Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 01:10:20AM -0800,
>   Paul Vixie<paul@redbarn.org>  wrote
>   a message of 31 lines which said:
>
>> we have no way to assure that they hear a request that they add more
>> secondary DNS zones to such servers. so if we delegate more zones
>> that way, there will be a lot of SERVFAIL except for servers who
>> send REFUSED. either way we have to consider the matter.
>
> This problem was solved a long time ago by RFC 7535 (the new AS 112).

ok.

-- 
P Vixie

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email