Re: [DNSOP] Some distinctions and a request - Have some class?

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Sat, 04 July 2015 06:31 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E28011A87C5 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 23:31:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.664
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.664 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, LOTS_OF_MONEY=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 35h2KVKo8vsn for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 23:31:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C11441A87BC for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 23:31:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 43993 invoked from network); 4 Jul 2015 06:31:58 -0000
Received: from unknown (64.57.183.18) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 4 Jul 2015 06:31:58 -0000
Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2015 06:31:20 -0000
Message-ID: <20150704063120.2380.qmail@ary.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <B1587D70-D30F-4FD6-AAB7-AC8AAE8FB1DB@karoshi.com>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/BsnWovwIH81KsIcUw7W-kqaQ7Fk>
Cc: bmanning@karoshi.com
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Some distinctions and a request - Have some class?
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2015 06:31:47 -0000

>I guess my question here is, what would prevent House Finch Feathers OY from applying
>for the DNS(IN) string ONION from ICANN because they want that as a TLD in the IN
>class?

At the moment, nothing.  

Remember, we also have a draft about .HOME and .CORP and .MAIL.  ICANN
says they're not planning to delegate those names, but they have about
20 active applications and $3.7M in application fees for those names
which suggests that their plan may not be entirely final.  That's why
I think we need an ongoing way to identify names that should stay out
of the DNS for engineering reasons.

R's,
John