IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-mglt-dnsop-dnssec-validator-requirements

Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 11 May 2020 13:04 UTC

Return-Path: <mglt.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D2F63A0A03; Mon, 11 May 2020 06:04:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VIixckCWHF3N; Mon, 11 May 2020 06:04:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe2c.google.com (mail-vs1-xe2c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94A263A0AA0; Mon, 11 May 2020 06:04:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe2c.google.com with SMTP id g2so5513894vsb.4; Mon, 11 May 2020 06:04:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=zH3d6jEQMkFYDcoSNt4MJ+R5K41YktvB4NzdcMt0HtA=; b=arWFm9yxCAVl6BNo6OlgGsjVvePHnbEwGPwhj4aEjCVtPLYPMyxZw8yzTRws54Swpf WQFgjotmmJdYc3Et1i1rbH6+6jS994jWowYwXbxHJURZvS1sF8rxg7w8m/AMoMeq8HFt tDr2zFr7NFf9997JTGdRau64YqdoKFZwORHVqC4U1eunBlBwdeH421eRxiOV0LgelB8d 6bHlU1jfGnXEdSfRGvSnyDv4V0QBXBJ6D30tjPAp8P2pu1kIindRrpyZgDE0W6wqOJ2b xCdVnChji11/nIfUbg+7orClTsEoYC2c+mJEnBOkjvlns7AauEQZcyH8ko9Uvr6O0wX9 IEoA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=zH3d6jEQMkFYDcoSNt4MJ+R5K41YktvB4NzdcMt0HtA=; b=FhYMhlmMIIDcFjoaR28odptU3gGSZHK8ZKA5nP3tSScJbOHiDcY+CSVZh9d//1M2ff MLcKNjvXLsIBrCHiGbXUpxt6e63aNMzAiE+VgCuJ74BfRJw/prRTM4huAECmBzf3vfyp 9UT9/Ab3mDLuPwuf4ob/UoQUVXNdbJflDBXryjSbex/6r7HrLTpWVhlMPiVYpdFBFYcI znqiuhgPNeSdM8EZITg8z3zRiFf+HXEDBdj6wJ9E0a7ZqGEMgLdVn4D+7JkvjCL7bnxG Eo8lLhb16dkGRZE69+VVAe61LbWA3hvVBqXyk4BQspVno0dtmaBdpLs9momVIOinaKTX undw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuYKYKxgxVVG3Fw6Ng5lL2IpsIJk8mdoHGVtaFUekUfmqQQxcnP2 au3+bEZ31wJwe4e00RfoRwH++y6B8hCqyZNKdsU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypK/izxaR72/GR4fS/3OtA43AEyIb/chkdnj39ZHLlvp02Tg8gAYv0pwxiOxFQksA544pB07IYpCvCdTqkrdtF8=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:3117:: with SMTP id e23mr10760055vsh.97.1589202267506; Mon, 11 May 2020 06:04:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CADyWQ+HTU92FYYFvogsur9jSZ+qj03PWPVNbiWSe4g_zCn=5wg@mail.gmail.com> <B9147976-F79F-4AD6-966D-5FC8A948A024@hopcount.ca> <CADZyTkkOLExUbJ=EPbjcTVR8D8aZpdpsic-S=hGN9MkoBED_BQ@mail.gmail.com> <42A20E19-C43C-4093-8483-07B0A85386E3@hopcount.ca> <CADyWQ+H8w6UPmhgNyL69WdCVKDbaEV_ufJ8_VLSgrug1Cb8CpQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADyWQ+H8w6UPmhgNyL69WdCVKDbaEV_ufJ8_VLSgrug1Cb8CpQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 09:04:16 -0400
Message-ID: <CADZyTknC966nbfz4ytcvqh5TaVD11HF-Z8Sd4K=_NFLqP+HTPg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, dnsop-chairs <dnsop-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a1b18905a55efce4"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/BtNdGFAIwwJLbhepAeEqYfU_yv0>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-mglt-dnsop-dnssec-validator-requirements
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 13:04:32 -0000

Hi Tim,

Just to clarify, I fully agree there is a lot of similarities and we will
work on it with Joe.

Yours,
Daniel

On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 8:16 PM Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Daniel
>
> Thanks for taking Joe's draft under advice and I agree there is work to be
> collaborated on.
>
> Tim
> (speaking as a chair)
>
> On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 3:42 PM Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca> wrote:
>
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> On 7 May 2020, at 15:39, Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Thanks for putting the reference of that draft. I have always thought
>> that the draft you were mentioning was the one that became RFC7958.
>>
>> 7958 came from draft-jabley-dnssec-trust-anchor, but the confusion is
>> entirely reasonable!
>>
>> > The current draft mentions that TA should be associated with
>> bootstrapping mechanism and that boostrapping for the root zone should be
>> extended to other TA.
>>
>> Yep.
>>
>> > There are clearly some overlap between the two drafts and I also have
>> the impression the drafts can be merged.
>> > the following issue has been opened:
>> >
>> https://github.com/mglt/draft-mglt-dnsop-dnssec-validator-requirements/issues/7
>>
>> Happy to help with that if it's something that the authors/working group
>> decide is useful.
>>
>> I support adoption of this draft, now that I've read it properly.
>>
>>
>> Joe
>>
>

-- 
Daniel Migault
Ericsson

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email