Re: [DNSOP] back to: Some distinctions and a request

Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org> Thu, 02 July 2015 17:34 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@redbarn.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 225B61A039F for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 10:34:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jOv2oCkLVZ6G for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 10:34:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from family.redbarn.org (family.redbarn.org [IPv6:2001:559:8000:cd::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CE391A039C for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 10:34:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:559:8000:cb:2078:69a6:75c4:8057] (unknown [IPv6:2001:559:8000:cb:2078:69a6:75c4:8057]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by family.redbarn.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CE796184E4; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 17:34:46 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <55957632.1090704@redbarn.org>
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 10:34:42 -0700
From: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
User-Agent: Postbox 4.0.2 (Windows/20150522)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: manning <bmanning@karoshi.com>
References: <6CB05D82CE245B4083BBF3B97E2ED470C27498@ait-pex01mbx01.win.dtu.dk>, <D1BAA21E.CA2E%edward.lewis@icann.org>, <6CB05D82CE245B4083BBF3B97E2ED470C2759F@ait-pex01mbx01.win.dtu.dk> <6CB05D82CE245B4083BBF3B97E2ED470C275B2@ait-pex01mbx01.win.dtu.dk>, <E225C721-7279-4053-97A2-2D63A155DA14@karoshi.com> <6CB05D82CE245B4083BBF3B97E2ED470C27602@ait-pex01mbx01.win.dtu.dk> <88E49F4B-64BD-4832-BD02-D1A882874E92@karoshi.com>
In-Reply-To: <88E49F4B-64BD-4832-BD02-D1A882874E92@karoshi.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2.3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/CTeJ1d02oBGVG4SPGAOQDKhqKpA>
Cc: Hugo Maxwell Connery <hmco@env.dtu.dk>, "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] back to: Some distinctions and a request
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 17:34:48 -0000


manning wrote:
> ... STRONGLY suggests that “domain-looking-string” is , in fact, a
> host that is identified using the Internet DNS.

i agree with this interpretation, which means, it's the spec itself
that's wrong, not hugo's interpretation of it. the internet people
didn't love .UUCP addresses either but that didn't stop them from working.

what the internet should be doing is defining escape mechanisms for
non-internet systems, rather than saying "we are the only thing you can
use".

-- 
Paul Vixie