Re: [DNSOP] The Larger Discussion on Differences in Response Drafts

Marek Vavruša <mvavrusa@cloudflare.com> Thu, 18 August 2016 18:29 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160818175713.16299.qmail@ary.lan>
References: <DAE8C592-A5A6-4EDA-A100-67B7DD900C36@vpnc.org> <20160818175713.16299.qmail@ary.lan>
From: Marek Vavruša <mvavrusa@cloudflare.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 11:29:09 -0700
Message-ID: <CAC=TB12PtSpU3_mL0+QdmJwqvfYm4go=fmtK80aRg7On6XgfHg@mail.gmail.com>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/I_D9433CBtWgWO7tLRyjEU1qvmg>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] The Larger Discussion on Differences in Response Drafts
Precedence: list

Or SRV. These are cases where authoritative/resolver adding
interesting records as additionals works better.
Authoritatives have been doing that with extra SOA/NS in authority for
a while (for positive answers), but now
resolvers can hardly use them if these records are not secure.

Regardless of which draft is going to be adopted, it should be
explicitly stated which records should client accept.
e.g. pushed A+AAAA matching QNAME could be accepted even from insecure
zones, but records matching SRV target shouldn't be.

Marek

On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 10:57 AM, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
>>Are there QTYPEs that, when I ask for them, I won't know that I should
>>also ask for the related info?
>
> NAPTR
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Re: [DNSOP] The Larger Discussion on Differences … Mark Andrews
Re: [DNSOP] The Larger Discussion on Differences … Edward Lewis
Re: [DNSOP] The Larger Discussion on Differences … Edward Lewis
Re: [DNSOP] The Larger Discussion on Differences … Mark Andrews
Re: [DNSOP] The Larger Discussion on Differences … Marek Vavruša
Re: [DNSOP] The Larger Discussion on Differences … Mark Andrews
Re: [DNSOP] The Larger Discussion on Differences … Marek Vavruša
Re: [DNSOP] The Larger Discussion on Differences … Paul Hoffman
Re: [DNSOP] The Larger Discussion on Differences … Marek Vavruša
Re: [DNSOP] The Larger Discussion on Differences … Paul Hoffman
Re: [DNSOP] The Larger Discussion on Differences … Matthew Pounsett
Re: [DNSOP] The Larger Discussion on Differences … Paul Hoffman
Re: [DNSOP] The Larger Discussion on Differences … Matthew Pounsett
Re: [DNSOP] The Larger Discussion on Differences … william manning
Re: [DNSOP] The Larger Discussion on Differences … abby pan
Re: [DNSOP] The Larger Discussion on Differences … Matthew Pounsett
Re: [DNSOP] The Larger Discussion on Differences … Bob Harold
Re: [DNSOP] The Larger Discussion on Differences … fujiwara
Re: [DNSOP] The Larger Discussion on Differences … william manning
Re: [DNSOP] The Larger Discussion on Differences … George Michaelson
Re: [DNSOP] The Larger Discussion on Differences … Paul Hoffman
Re: [DNSOP] The Larger Discussion on Differences … George Michaelson
[DNSOP] The Larger Discussion on Differences in R… Tim Wicinski
Re: [DNSOP] The Larger Discussion on Differences … Tony Finch
Re: [DNSOP] The Larger Discussion on Differences … Tony Finch
Re: [DNSOP] The Larger Discussion on Differences … william manning
Re: [DNSOP] The Larger Discussion on Differences … Tony Finch
Re: [DNSOP] The Larger Discussion on Differences … Shane Kerr