Re: [DNSOP] CDS and/or CDNSKEY

[Mark Andrews <[e-mail]>]

The DNS has more than one opcode.  Why don't we just use one of
them to discover the registrar for <qname,qtype,qclass>?  If you
get back NOTIMP you fallback to traditional UPDATE to the parent.
The response to the query would be PTR record(s) to the UPDATE
server(s).

Mark

In message <[e-mail]>, Paul Hoffman writes
:
> On Oct 8, 2013, at 1:10 PM, Doug Barton <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> >> That is the opposite of the feeling that I got from the DNSOP meeting in B
> erlin.
> > 
> > ... and yet, there is a larger world outside the select few able to attend 
> the meetings. :)  One could even reasonably argue that the opinion of those w
> ho do attend the meetings is of questionable statistical validity due to volu
> nteer bias.
> 
> If your view is that the only way to write a standard is after you have heard
>  from a majority of everyone who would be affected by it, that's fine, but it
>  is not the model that is used standards bodies like the IETF.
> 
> --Paul Hoffman
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: [phone]                 INTERNET: [e-mail]