IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] CDS and/or CDNSKEY

Billy Glynn <billy.glynn@iedr.ie> Wed, 09 October 2013 11:10 UTC

Return-Path: <billy.glynn@iedr.ie>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89F0321E8121 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 04:10:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JC2M0vgYTipG for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 04:10:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from titan01.iedr.ie (titan01.iedr.ie [83.71.193.66]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F322421F9A78 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 04:10:12 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_734FF3F4-B6B0-4D2C-9A79-27546E5E555A"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
From: Billy Glynn <billy.glynn@iedr.ie>
In-Reply-To: <2777018E-AE0E-4781-AA6C-5F92E46B1CAD@kumari.net>
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 12:10:05 +0100
Message-Id: <8BD43725-A4CF-4EF7-ABBC-B542E300DC93@iedr.ie>
References: <CE7257AA.D9AD%bdickson@verisign.com>, <alpine.LFD.2.10.1310022330290.21614@bofh.nohats.ca> <201310031159387926584@cnnic.cn> <524D128A.5050701@nlnetlabs.nl> <F4E5DA98-0A19-4E0A-AF27-0FC83F7A560A@kumari.net> <alpine.LFD.2.10.1310031606040.28168@bofh.nohats.ca> <524E5747.3020708@nlnetlabs.nl> <C5EB17D8-80AB-4FCF-85B5-09EDBCA419E6@ogud.com> <B9CF170E-6F56-4912-B57C-2DAA6CE88E4C@kumari.net> <2777018E-AE0E-4781-AA6C-5F92E46B1CAD@kumari.net>
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 11:17:54 -0700
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] CDS and/or CDNSKEY
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 11:10:20 -0000

On 5 Oct 2013, at 19:55, Warren Kumari wrote:

> So, would like to get some feedback on this version -- I understand that it might not please everyone, such is the nature of compromise.
> 
> W
> 
> Filename:	 draft-kumari-ogud-dnsop-cds
> Revision:	 05

Section 2.2.1

"The proposal
   below can operate with both models, but the child needs to be aware
   of the parental policies."
also
Section 6.2.1
"The
   DNS Parent needs to publish guidelines for the children as to what
   digest algorithms are acceptable in the CDS record."

Maybe I'm missed it... but how would a child be aware of the "parental policies"?	
Billy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email