IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] CDS and/or CDNSKEY

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Tue, 08 October 2013 22:31 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B54921F9FAB for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 15:31:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id owUM7jRBByRU for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 15:31:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7663A21F9468 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 15:31:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.90] (50-1-98-185.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [50.1.98.185]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r98MVaca093173 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 8 Oct 2013 15:31:37 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: hoffman.proper.com: Host 50-1-98-185.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [50.1.98.185] claimed to be [10.20.30.90]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <525466A5.6000006@dougbarton.us>
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 15:31:36 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <CA10D493-A48A-4659-9D0B-6DFC83E40DB9@vpnc.org>
References: <5243DCAB.80507@nlnetlabs.nl> <311D023E-9425-416E-B3E6-96F3347F162B@kumari.net> <52451D58.5040107@nlnetlabs.nl> <FC382AE9-C360-47B3-B1B6-35276C624AAC@kumari.net> <524D9B65.30704@teamaol.com> <52543899.3090801@dougbarton.us> <alpine.LFD.2.10.1310081408570.7675@bofh.nohats.ca> <52545387.2010607@dougbarton.us> <24BAD69C-F0AA-4F33-8A3D-536494864D34@vpnc.org> <525466A5.6000006@dougbarton.us>
To: Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] CDS and/or CDNSKEY
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 22:31:41 -0000

On Oct 8, 2013, at 1:10 PM, Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us> wrote:

>> That is the opposite of the feeling that I got from the DNSOP meeting in Berlin.
> 
> ... and yet, there is a larger world outside the select few able to attend the meetings. :)  One could even reasonably argue that the opinion of those who do attend the meetings is of questionable statistical validity due to volunteer bias.

If your view is that the only way to write a standard is after you have heard from a majority of everyone who would be affected by it, that's fine, but it is not the model that is used standards bodies like the IETF.

--Paul Hoffman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email