Re: [DNSOP] CDS and/or CDNSKEY
Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> Tue, 08 October 2013 23:14 UTC
Return-Path: <marka@isc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D06B21F9BB5 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 16:14:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.788
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.788 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.481, BAYES_00=-2.599, MISSING_HEADERS=1.292]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1Sk8ytZlA5Pa for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 16:14:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (mx.pao1.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:0:2::2b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1E2E21F9D68 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 16:14:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C8EAC942B; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 23:13:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marka@isc.org)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=isc.org; s=dkim2012; t=1381274048; bh=iWa8mmqwFEMKz6XH8cdO0njyEETXo7SVLqfsjeQfdng=; h=Cc:From:Subject:In-reply-to:Date; b=KYcJyx4OABhGMKRa12vdn/9YJS8fPvooh981VxIlYXAvYQmClkcVQSHanhq4/cMGg bwbG8b4Cuwurm4/pER3ZL1XzBaulY0Gm4GULYApvbPbyO16fD7BP9O7C6mopfs2l3u SfhltlOzo+NJJUxP8waoyqQZAC6MNQh41ECysuaY=
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (zmx1.isc.org [149.20.0.20]) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 23:13:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marka@isc.org)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A72416042E; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 23:17:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rock.dv.isc.org (c211-30-183-50.carlnfd1.nsw.optusnet.com.au [211.30.183.50]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0C19C160030; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 23:17:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rock.dv.isc.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rock.dv.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45B207F87DC; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 10:13:53 +1100 (EST)
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 09 Oct 2013 09:59:00 +1100."
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 10:13:53 +1100
Message-Id: <20131008231353.45B207F87DC@rock.dv.isc.org>
X-DCC--Metrics: post.isc.org; whitelist
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] CDS and/or CDNSKEY
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 23:14:16 -0000
Mark Andrews writes: > > The DNS has more than one opcode. Why don't we just use one of > them to discover the registrar for <qname,qtype,qclass>? If you > get back NOTIMP you fallback to traditional UPDATE to the parent. > The response to the query would be PTR record(s) to the UPDATE > server(s). I would use whois for this discovery but the response is free form text and you have the whole whois server discovery problem to deal with. Registrars already trust the registry to supply this information over whois. > Mark > > In message <CA10D493-A48A-4659-9D0B-6DFC83E40DB9@vpnc.org>, Paul Hoffman writ > es > : > > On Oct 8, 2013, at 1:10 PM, Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us> wrote: > > > > >> That is the opposite of the feeling that I got from the DNSOP meeting in > B > > erlin. > > > > > > ... and yet, there is a larger world outside the select few able to atten > d > > the meetings. :) One could even reasonably argue that the opinion of those > w > > ho do attend the meetings is of questionable statistical validity due to vo > lu > > nteer bias. > > > > If your view is that the only way to write a standard is after you have hea > rd > > from a majority of everyone who would be affected by it, that's fine, but > it > > is not the model that is used standards bodies like the IETF. > > > > --Paul Hoffman > > _______________________________________________ > > DNSOP mailing list > > DNSOP@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop > -- > Mark Andrews, ISC > 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia > PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka@isc.org -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka@isc.org
- Re: [DNSOP] CDS and/or CDNSKEY Matthijs Mekking
- Re: [DNSOP] CDS and/or CDNSKEY Warren Kumari
- [DNSOP] CDS and/or CDNSKEY Matthijs Mekking
- Re: [DNSOP] CDS and/or CDNSKEY Warren Kumari
- Re: [DNSOP] CDS and/or CDNSKEY Paul Wouters
- Re: [DNSOP] CDS and/or CDNSKEY Dickson, Brian
- Re: [DNSOP] CDS and/or CDNSKEY Paul Wouters
- Re: [DNSOP] CDS and/or CDNSKEY Guangqing Deng
- Re: [DNSOP] CDS and/or CDNSKEY Matthijs Mekking
- Re: [DNSOP] CDS and/or CDNSKEY Tim Wicinski
- Re: [DNSOP] CDS and/or CDNSKEY Warren Kumari
- Re: [DNSOP] CDS and/or CDNSKEY Paul Wouters
- Re: [DNSOP] CDS and/or CDNSKEY Matthijs Mekking
- Re: [DNSOP] CDS and/or CDNSKEY Warren Kumari
- Re: [DNSOP] CDS and/or CDNSKEY Olafur Gudmundsson
- Re: [DNSOP] CDS and/or CDNSKEY Warren Kumari
- Re: [DNSOP] CDS and/or CDNSKEY Warren Kumari
- Re: [DNSOP] CDS and/or CDNSKEY Matthijs Mekking
- Re: [DNSOP] CDS and/or CDNSKEY Doug Barton
- Re: [DNSOP] CDS and/or CDNSKEY Paul Wouters
- Re: [DNSOP] CDS and/or CDNSKEY Doug Barton
- Re: [DNSOP] CDS and/or CDNSKEY Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] CDS and/or CDNSKEY Doug Barton
- Re: [DNSOP] CDS and/or CDNSKEY Warren Kumari
- Re: [DNSOP] CDS and/or CDNSKEY Doug Barton
- Re: [DNSOP] CDS and/or CDNSKEY Paul Wouters
- Re: [DNSOP] CDS and/or CDNSKEY Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] CDS and/or CDNSKEY Olafur Gudmundsson
- Re: [DNSOP] CDS and/or CDNSKEY Alan Clegg
- Re: [DNSOP] CDS and/or CDNSKEY Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] CDS and/or CDNSKEY Warren Kumari
- Re: [DNSOP] CDS and/or CDNSKEY Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] CDS and/or CDNSKEY Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] CDS and/or CDNSKEY Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [DNSOP] CDS and/or CDNSKEY Guangqing Deng
- Re: [DNSOP] CDS and/or CDNSKEY Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] CDS and/or CDNSKEY Ondřej Surý
- Re: [DNSOP] CDS and/or CDNSKEY Ondřej Surý
- Re: [DNSOP] CDS and/or CDNSKEY Ondřej Surý
- Re: [DNSOP] CDS and/or CDNSKEY Warren Kumari
- Re: [DNSOP] CDS and/or CDNSKEY Paul Wouters
- Re: [DNSOP] CDS and/or CDNSKEY Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] CDS and/or CDNSKEY Billy Glynn
- Re: [DNSOP] CDS and/or CDNSKEY Ondřej Surý
- Re: [DNSOP] CDS and/or CDNSKEY Ondřej Surý
- Re: [DNSOP] CDS and/or CDNSKEY Paul Wouters
- Re: [DNSOP] CDS and/or CDNSKEY Ondřej Surý
- Re: [DNSOP] CDS and/or CDNSKEY Wes Hardaker