Re: [DNSOP] Minimum viable ANAME

Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk> Mon, 05 November 2018 08:42 UTC

Return-Path: <ray@bellis.me.uk>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFC75129AB8 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 00:42:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WqekIiMTjY8U for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 00:42:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hydrogen.portfast.net (hydrogen.portfast.net [188.246.200.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 718CD128CFD for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 00:42:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp-9701.meeting.ietf.org ([31.133.151.1]:56747) by hydrogen.portfast.net ([188.246.200.2]:465) with esmtpsa (fixed_plain:ray@bellis.me.uk) (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) id 1gJaSX-0000xs-8x (Exim 4.72) for dnsop@ietf.org (return-path <ray@bellis.me.uk>); Mon, 05 Nov 2018 08:42:09 +0000
To: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <CAH1iCip60jtt8o-3jcnvGZ4bMLynFAS3Xo+Qk5G=cVaWq8oTug@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk>
Message-ID: <ca3808f9-afc4-0035-50cb-b9eebc8c1d02@bellis.me.uk>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 15:42:04 +0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAH1iCip60jtt8o-3jcnvGZ4bMLynFAS3Xo+Qk5G=cVaWq8oTug@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-GB
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/OZ0JXYmHXSw177YFJmWKEd8Pq6Y>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Minimum viable ANAME
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2018 08:42:14 -0000


On 05/11/2018 12:51, Brian Dickson wrote:

> It's a lot better than ANAME, and I think we do a disservice to 
> ourselves as a DNS community, if we do anything other than put our 
> collective support into it, preferably unanimously.

Thank for you the support!

> I see getting http adopted and deployed, and fixing the single major 
> web-specific deficiency in DNS, as critical to attempting to head off 
> DoH, which is the biggest bugbear at the moment.

But please, let's not get into that argument.  The only way to stave off 
adding complexity in the DNS to fix the CNAME at apex problem is with 
the cooperation of the browser vendors (and as Tim notes, the major 
authoritative operators).  We need their help, just like they need ours.

Ray