Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Action: draft-chapin-additional-reserved-tlds-00.txt
Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Tue, 04 February 2014 01:50 UTC
Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 657851A0341 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 17:50:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.141
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.141 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_INFO=1.448, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eD7ASGmE25Uv for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 17:50:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx1.yitter.info (ow5p.x.rootbsd.net [208.79.81.114]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 716241A02F5 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 17:50:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx1.yitter.info (c-75-69-155-67.hsd1.nh.comcast.net [75.69.155.67]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C87588A031 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 01:50:28 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 20:50:27 -0500
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20140204015026.GC53095@mx1.yitter.info>
References: <6BE00F1A-1F8D-4B30-A5C7-10E7466109C2@vpnc.org> <ACF06352-98E5-4368-A8C9-5AB50783C2D3@hopcount.ca> <20140203212333.1259EE44493@rock.dv.isc.org> <CF15D98C.197C0B%jonne.soininen@renesasmobile.com> <CAKr6gn1dpWz3LP9bpA2JebRDSN7GeOW65+Q1tW_dv=9KzgZaCQ@mail.gmail.com> <A6D7CE2E-BF9C-4077-A571-0C455E5DAE1F@nominum.com> <CAKr6gn08xayJCK_GtGNeYbet6tD=GwPJoSYL3tbRXomfxckHWA@mail.gmail.com> <ED2AE016-766D-41DE-A428-DEC49A350E8C@nominum.com> <20140204012148.GE16180@mx1.yitter.info> <1397C673-86CD-40A1-9055-17B3B74FAC80@nominum.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <1397C673-86CD-40A1-9055-17B3B74FAC80@nominum.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Action: draft-chapin-additional-reserved-tlds-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 01:50:33 -0000
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 08:32:04PM -0500, Ted Lemon wrote: > This is the "you didn't follow process" argument. But they couldn't > have followed process—there was no realistic process for allocating > a special-use TLD before 6761 was published. So this amounts to an > emotional appeal, which isn't much of a justification for the change > you are demanding of them. The DNS works -- has _always worked_ -- on the principle that you register your names if you want to use them on the Internet. This is just as true of top level names as of anything else. It is true that when .onion (to stick to our example) was adopted, there wasn't a mechanism other than going to ICANN to get a TLD. (There certainly was a mechanism via the ICANN route at the time.) I'm not sure how to interpret this part of your argument except, "If the mechanism for what you want to do doesn't exist or is too inconvenient, just do whatever you want." That has interesting implications for the IANA function. Moreover, 6761 is _perfectly clear_ that you're supposed to show that your use actually requires a TLD. I still don't see why .onion.arpa would've been a bad choice. Failing to answer that question really _would_ be not following the process. Finally, mine at least is not just an emotional argument; see above, variations of which I have repeated. Indeed, whether you intend it or not, your mails appear to me to be rather emotionally charged and dismissive of any pointy question or suggestion that the interests of the rest of the DNS (including the root management regime) need to be taken into consideration as well. It seems to me that you could read with a more generous application of the principle of charity. Best regards, A -- Andrew Sullivan ajs@anvilwalrusden.com
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Paul Hoffman
- [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Action:… Suzanne Woolf
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Stuart Cheshire
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… George Michaelson
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Jim Reid
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… John R Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Lyman Chapin
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Stuart Cheshire
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Stuart Cheshire
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Ralf Weber
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Ralf Weber
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Ralf Weber
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… jonne.soininen
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… George Michaelson
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… George Michaelson
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… George Michaelson
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… jonne.soininen
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Patrik Fältström
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Jim Reid
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Paul Ferguson
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Suzanne Woolf
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] possibly quite a lot of additional sp… John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… joel jaeggli
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Stuart Cheshire
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Stuart Cheshire
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… David Conrad
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… David Conrad
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… David Conrad
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Mark Andrews
- [DNSOP] DNSSEC, additional special names & draft-… Jim Reid
- Re: [DNSOP] DNSSEC, additional special names & dr… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] DNSSEC, additional special names & dr… Jim Reid
- Re: [DNSOP] DNSSEC, additional special names & dr… Tony Finch
- Re: [DNSOP] DNSSEC, additional special names & dr… Tony Finch
- Re: [DNSOP] DNSSEC, additional special names & dr… Jim Reid
- Re: [DNSOP] DNSSEC, additional special names & dr… Tony Finch
- [DNSOP] admin note Re: additional special names F… Suzanne Woolf
- Re: [DNSOP] DNSSEC, additional special names & dr… John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] DNSSEC, additional special names & dr… Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] DNSSEC, additional special names & dr… John R Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] DNSSEC, additional special names & dr… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Stuart Cheshire
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Warren Kumari
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Norbert Bollow
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… joel jaeggli
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Jelte Jansen
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Tony Finch
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Jelte Jansen
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Olafur Gudmundsson
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Jelte Jansen
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Warren Kumari
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Warren Kumari
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Warren Kumari
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Warren Kumari
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Tim Wicinsku
- Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Act… Suzanne Woolf