IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Action: draft-chapin-additional-reserved-tlds-00.txt

Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca> Tue, 04 February 2014 14:41 UTC

Return-Path: <jabley@hopcount.ca>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44B571A0100 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 06:41:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KG04B8TSsxmB for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 06:41:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qc0-x22b.google.com (mail-qc0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9169B1A0126 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 06:41:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qc0-f171.google.com with SMTP id n7so13579012qcx.2 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 06:41:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hopcount.ca; s=google; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=FMuSCH8HnOPEFphaTL9CELb5TuJUptCorwjfCdlPYH8=; b=hAViRxK162TEvmuHBjA/oEbpA7oGCDmuIXVw6+T5aMm0hZqyU/pXKCdVNKmkCgQEqJ hsEommM9FCUPWEGmNfk7Atcr5wwDkrV3nAK7MuIf3s/yKz8JmSCkeW+66FXe91CHPgqO 7VG7Aux7FUqS/L5Tm1moR3IixYuICvoLiRdgY=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to; bh=FMuSCH8HnOPEFphaTL9CELb5TuJUptCorwjfCdlPYH8=; b=JftOKfnJmnjdaE4OyJuJQnkQ36bBxmiJsQkkYIyI0Y4FBTDmFSxPD3JF766vI81X3D p1lcGEFUM9bxmbEiCi1a2hHCNBBtHxwj/WtIqLkCSmMytLrMpo0KpAVIpCsERyAIcXf8 0fFKtyjCA9ED91VNvc/DyACE7E1RSllJE3KZO9XgbBjZGij62wlV6m8/QdmlhSyANfwI sUfLnuJmnrmY0XOAbqYCPBPcZtxA1oZ4xspQsz9BhhB/DUI6t/aJ8YS4lyS9vUTDqbqO DdS2DhFveDAqH+AbVXNVgox8VJNXMCXUeWFEYFT4LU20/rnvhIgZEDcB5Fo36gkErvXb B5NQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnHNPCNB5DBl6QDmVbqYPxaQ4yzhMINgR+XI7NQQi08n3eoRVm21flXPUHyENcI258tBAmg
X-Received: by 10.140.30.66 with SMTP id c60mr62457123qgc.13.1391524879101; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 06:41:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.16.29.101] (nat-08-mht.dyndns.com. [216.146.45.247]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id d7sm67392936qad.10.2014.02.04.06.41.17 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 04 Feb 2014 06:41:18 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_35485591-FDAF-404B-A563-8ABC0F9A4986"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\))
From: Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>
In-Reply-To: <20140204063911.55905.qmail@joyce.lan>
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 09:41:16 -0500
Message-Id: <AACA56B2-52E6-416A-9CAF-CB7A7BE1ECC8@hopcount.ca>
References: <20140204063911.55905.qmail@joyce.lan>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827)
Cc: "dnsop@ietf.org WG" <dnsop@ietf.org>, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Action: draft-chapin-additional-reserved-tlds-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 14:41:21 -0000

On 2014-02-04, at 01:39, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:

> I suppose the situation with .onion is slightly different, but in
> concept it's not all that different from .arpa.

I think it's quite different.

ARPA is really no different from any other TLD. There's a registry, there are rules you need to follow to get a delegation, but it's a zone in the DNS just like COM and ORG.

ONION is a namespace convention outside the DNS. There's no registry, it's not a zone, and there is no possibility of getting a delegation.

ONION is like LOCAL. Neither are like ARPA (or any other TLD).


Joe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email