Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis-05.txt

"Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Fri, 07 April 2017 17:58 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27C951296DB for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 10:58:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gtQnZmq2kFC3 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 10:58:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.proper.com (Opus1.Proper.COM [207.182.41.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A639D1296CE for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 10:57:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.32.60.173] (142-254-101-176.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [142.254.101.176]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.proper.com (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id v37HviEu058480 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 7 Apr 2017 10:57:45 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: mail.proper.com: Host 142-254-101-176.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [142.254.101.176] claimed to be [10.32.60.173]
From: "Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
To: "Peter van Dijk" <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2017 10:57:57 -0700
Message-ID: <88FAB370-FFE4-4E90-9B31-651C09798983@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <FD1D5AD8-6907-4144-AB31-F1226779CDE3@powerdns.com>
References: <148942077219.17007.342057944218385620@ietfa.amsl.com> <20170328143352.GA12923@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org> <FD1D5AD8-6907-4144-AB31-F1226779CDE3@powerdns.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.6r5347)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/VYfD37F1MRlP2mpv-Qic1X_nRbQ>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis-05.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2017 17:58:12 -0000

On 4 Apr 2017, at 23:57, Peter van Dijk wrote:

> Notwithstanding your stubborn redefinition in 8020, the text in 2308 
> is correct and this erratum is wrong.

That "stubborn redefinition" has modern WG and IETF consensus.

--Paul Hoffman