IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] [internet-drafts@ietf.org: New Version Notification for draft-sullivan-dns-class-useless-01.txt]

David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> Fri, 18 March 2016 20:13 UTC

Return-Path: <drc@virtualized.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4751212D586 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 13:13:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=virtualized-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QoqVRF4VmsIu for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 13:13:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x230.google.com (mail-wm0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B06B12D530 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 13:13:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x230.google.com with SMTP id p65so52135565wmp.0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 13:13:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=virtualized-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references :to; bh=990plACN+p2NvnQTpbIm3+jOj/jZvOWv0HNp+ke97F8=; b=Q9fc2XkU343NtrE97RjtFI0KwN7LvF1pT7cwkeWu/niJI5yQa9TIB+8M7E5BqiyTS0 pKllnDdDH6g5idYRorn1Z5tqFe1+sHAQEAULUbC0GFsqkofml5h1NHNp0f6HD4iGn7E1 0k3dnWryar2WoVksCXfBNO9E5hemTs77Bbvbflz5uGBbTbC7kL58bas3vUe7uEdU8HqU jBcix/hbnWNjMc29DXMel8/+46G4YiLqeGJlVzV1CaAJFjjOYlG5GlSTBGIQWKQZY068 4PTMFC1aA0+5nO2ErfMSjUGZSYnk321uqjhW/JuKdfqzDOdnP3sTXtQLEbHbScmXVT9W dfUw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=990plACN+p2NvnQTpbIm3+jOj/jZvOWv0HNp+ke97F8=; b=loCkOVF4APifKIe4NJTkCT5ACncioDvjYMmeqieHlWGgVjJ1AaEBsuMBzpXzXRvrKI BLpj5+6pQ+i/+PzdPpCW5TLDdMUt0e3mAv2ar/OOa6E9AN64fjfWWanlf5+P+HdM8l2l T78f4TV6ADI+bdRXfFYI4B0G8Aqj8DbrbrszKacI2dG3jRobSN6Bub7N9tM7jsDOcke6 oqrPgcyY9+UD/x0mUHGJB8zRH+4sTniHWyJh4jO+7cbRYfXHSfUTy0ZrUh6c09WpeQk1 br8/mHF22vbJkC7nXXzxzFRrgSvEI5idFf2CCViFH1dLfPqjibwmkLfB1XaFg13OaJsy CCsQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJf2xascpa/v4vyjWOWGA9HbcpNq4KSLZu/lxuHLJoET/k1v9AUMYC0RzdXrgZ8Rw==
X-Received: by 10.194.123.102 with SMTP id lz6mr19810364wjb.2.1458332035817; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 13:13:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.19.248.105] ([64.88.227.134]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id gt7sm13648664wjc.1.2016.03.18.13.13.45 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 18 Mar 2016 13:13:54 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_77F222DD-E6C5-411A-99F4-B31ECBF46223"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.6b2
From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
In-Reply-To: <40E59796-1877-4D28-BB08-7C2075EDF720@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:13:29 -0400
Message-Id: <13FFC49D-6D70-46CE-8B35-C5F497A3308D@virtualized.org>
References: <20160317161708.GB3053@mx2.yitter.info> <20160317203337.B3E86449BC1C@rock.dv.isc.org> <20160318145349.230c1d2c@pallas.home.time-travellers.org> <56EC528B.4030505@redbarn.org> <40E59796-1877-4D28-BB08-7C2075EDF720@gmail.com>
To: Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/W4BhGnEk1LQ7-yyTdZUc6gszG4U>
Cc: Shane Kerr <shane@time-travellers.org>, dnsop@ietf.org, Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [internet-drafts@ietf.org: New Version Notification for draft-sullivan-dns-class-useless-01.txt]
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 20:13:59 -0000

Suzanne,

On Mar 18, 2016, at 3:51 PM, Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com> wrote:
> There's an argument to be made that "People considered carefully and don't believe any amount of tinkering will make an idea that depends on CLASS workable, so the option isn't available" will result in shorter conversations about those ideas.

I love your optimism, however I am skeptical that closing the registry will have the desired effect.  I suspect a more likely outcome is that the conversations will instead get longer as they become heated as to whether or not the registry should be reopened.  I suspect a better answer for the desired effect you are hoping for by closing the registry would be an RFC that says "Classes Are Not The Droids You're Looking For" that would allow "DNS experts" to simply point to that document whenever someone suggests classes are a solution to any particular problem.

And no, I'm not offering to write said document :)

Regards,
-drc

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email