IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-bellis-dnsop-edns-tags-00.txt

Dick Franks <rwfranks@acm.org> Tue, 05 March 2019 01:20 UTC

Return-Path: <rwfranks@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B29A129441 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 17:20:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.879
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.879 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.018, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1cuAVc5zPL_Q for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 17:20:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-f45.google.com (mail-io1-f45.google.com [209.85.166.45]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80738128D52 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 17:20:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-f45.google.com with SMTP id v10so5632122iop.4 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 04 Mar 2019 17:20:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=7g1Tu1i+Oy01YPFhWY3Z23eO2BZF5CjsbEfM3aX9XlI=; b=HPDmzZi7wSghE2Yl5/IgOY2f/gwM2F/TcgUpwzhIhP2MWLVYcJLBz595aTd125rRMT XzMOjIC71g+EZCOIGDHKS5qM+6bUzaK7ZXB7WboPcpeZdHfnXPanqfTTP3xq8Ih4e4Qw pm+n1950lAoXfHxR4LqoKlg7HrOHMgfE/OiWxw+U3a00tmjukcCLs2G2o4N9eCgpKZ9w dQUBqajIi6IyU9Ru04VOAqAfolLNvln25DyjKv1nWyqR+IDDJXhCVcpu8wHvOn3YKp+o WRkcawO5ni2sWvY+NpbOTLhpwbCJGdawIM7EazvRQXvREd1lxVV8SLI4YtBa/eb76Obb CEnQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXEei7zS6HBV9vAr+AApSnkzRYBjaTq8scM4njT92mZsO8ZCetv g2Wa4qrKrVG29+hxexLurdWdztJxC5+F42qPACc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwspSqotY+iUU3K8tzu94gZ23Z2bTKCji3EPTZYG3B6mXwRg2TTHG6mBV3cGNTKIsS9OEKdUBlyIDebijNF64o=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:97c8:: with SMTP id k8mr12020389ios.267.1551748807714; Mon, 04 Mar 2019 17:20:07 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <155171606493.5281.3957934874516100450.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <5c3cc3f9-2225-9077-fb9e-0fb940bd1c1b@isc.org> <yblef7mp7io.fsf@wu.hardakers.net> <CAKW6Ri5doXL=uBpEy3Eqrkoyfu9rvt9upH9qxXkzZKUgS_=dMw@mail.gmail.com> <ybla7iap5nx.fsf@wu.hardakers.net> <B137690E-8063-4416-BFE2-706F0589AD5F@isc.org>
In-Reply-To: <B137690E-8063-4416-BFE2-706F0589AD5F@isc.org>
From: Dick Franks <rwfranks@acm.org>
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2019 01:19:31 +0000
Message-ID: <CAKW6Ri5O0VgEjwoyHoD_yG8Svu_m8hTFx4vaaa9SXkyBn47pGg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
Cc: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>, IETF DNSOP WG <dnsop@ietf.org>, Ray Bellis <ray@isc.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000076ebe105834eac8d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/XUrgJuz_1cCfdMKRrHpfs4qsBb8>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-bellis-dnsop-edns-tags-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2019 01:20:10 -0000

On Tue, 5 Mar 2019 at 00:45, Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> wrote:

8<

Presumably you won’t get back a server tag and you can log that.
>

Not always.

The spec does not require the server to return a server tag in response to
a client tag.
However, a server tag may only be returned in response to a request
containing a client tag.

--Dick

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email