Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-pan-dnsop-swild-rr-type-00.txt
Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Tue, 15 August 2017 17:27 UTC
Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3903513219E for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 10:27:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.878
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.878 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4uBO9UMYpAtA for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 10:27:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x232.google.com (mail-pg0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFACA132143 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 10:27:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x232.google.com with SMTP id i12so9458571pgr.3 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 10:27:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:cc; bh=SrCpjYlZjzGO+F0Sva417azpHJnORPG/zl11r4zVPJ8=; b=BZeu+qe0xeyZtWE0jO5ODd01VhXO0btoJWCSPwKvbW1vREYwNZn9ONutkxO5j0WvT/ GruCvR3a2KzLVWxrkwUEgvU1RdifV7IkiqHzYtseT9SMatCIuCX5r7Vnyp2VfzdB7v9M 5OmH0O0T+QEOe0mXiKUMht/l6tWFya0238NNC4iyoJ5DlLagzSzX5BStM+Oun99u9Y0G Zodb6+XSZgEtYlRinTuVP6uG0d6R1kpzjwZlqRoMpUAZA9s4oo2wIjKL2sPzi0aNtNDn dBmaDXaIVDoE9I9RFzJMG9Qy4IDV5ZcaS2w6M52QCSsD5eJ4hBmiF6Z1nxtywLUscpHm 6a9A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:cc; bh=SrCpjYlZjzGO+F0Sva417azpHJnORPG/zl11r4zVPJ8=; b=CDZwxixmJYATs1EOJJdQ4A24pM5zzkk6GkjkxDbG7wfxZktGMYc9cwHAA9ATKbwE+R OxK4MYtugtGR0iLm6YMta8GxxtPpK8Nz9gXAbqQaqrGnQX7UEOyGQrHeVZjj1XXhuhvo hJ7B+U9pNkO/HxY1Jusz4pXmaTUg1QVvlFA4XdEwn/lWm7FKN6S4dEW5/dFsg9v8msOG ToLECAbWlhVkp8ii6rTwfRPcYuLGiCgE9hxCpEOi+O3OkcNDs7VhCKOrkf06tcFkBNx/ VI6yuu+aqg/XErZxfR+F+tlYmQ0PtmKhu2FuGXLjT8Ba9qJFCwDlE7otN2XFbY/gjD4Z OkPw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5g6P4gZqp1x3el7rZ33ClghLRnrytluVTZDhoMenYhYdW1ojBSY U4CpIcNlPnKEmTrfahAA5/ol3/bTGcOZ
X-Received: by 10.98.200.152 with SMTP id i24mr29567861pfk.33.1502818072144; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 10:27:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.180.131 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 10:27:11 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <201708151341.v7FDfNqR039481@calcite.rhyolite.com>
References: <CANLjSvWFh0ER47=SFJB-3rkTJKT_OxcjKwcD9-DUkDDxJTo=+g@mail.gmail.com> <201708151341.v7FDfNqR039481@calcite.rhyolite.com>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 13:27:11 -0400
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1=2eFRBCHYptn6W=3ruFisN0xRcMQSPPakgZXnmsaTS5w@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c1113be5a458c0556ce19d0"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/ZmO8Yc315UwHkYGMOpOMJHsGcx8>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-pan-dnsop-swild-rr-type-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 17:27:55 -0000
I tried to ignore this thread for a while, but became alarmed after reading some of the recent comments, so I went and read the document. As far as I can tell, this document gives no clear justification for why it is a good idea. We have not been told of the practical operational problems that motivate it. It appears to solve a problem we have already solved, in a way that creates new security vulnerabilities. We have not been told why the existing solution to the problem is not adequate. If the authors have a real problem that they feel has not already been solved, the first step in the process ought to be to present that information to the working group, rather than to present a solution to the working group with no clear statement about the problem it solves, and in particular no data about the seriousness of the problem. For what it's worth, which isn't much since the chairs haven't issued a call for adoption, I don't think the working group should work on this. On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Vernon Schryver <vjs@rhyolite.com> wrote: > ] From: Lanlan Pan <abbypan@gmail.com> > > ] Give the choice to operators, time is the best witness, like IP surpassed > ] ATM. > > That is backwards. IP did not surpass ATM, because IP came long before > ATM. Instead, end-to-end ATM was the last gasp of the end-to-end > circuit switching point of view. End-to-end ATM was supposed to replace > IP, but instead the new virtual circuits of ATM came far too late and > did not solve the problems that packet switching had already solved. > > ATM has not yet died and is still common for some uses. For example, > ATM is used as x.25 was used under IP in the early days of IP; many > DSL installations use AMT VCs. > > A better and more relevant history is that of the SPF RR. The SPF RR > was supposed to replace the use of the TXT rtype for SPF. The SPF RR > was widely available in deployed DNS authoritative servers (via BIND). > I think it was in milter modules for sendmail and postfix. Nevertheless, > it died because it came late, was only a modest improvement, and required > operators to do something more than they were doing. > > > Vernon Schryver vjs@rhyolite.com > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >
- [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-p… Lanlan Pan
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Tony Finch
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Lanlan Pan
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Petr Špaček
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Lanlan Pan
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Matthew Pounsett
- Re: [DNSOP] New Version Notification for draft-pa… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Richard Gibson
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Lanlan Pan
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Matthew Pounsett
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Dave Crocker
- Re: [DNSOP] New Version Notification for draft-pa… Peter van Dijk
- Re: [DNSOP] New Version Notification for draft-pa… Matthew Pounsett
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Lanlan Pan
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Lanlan Pan
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Lanlan Pan
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Lanlan Pan
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Vernon Schryver
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Lanlan Pan
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Vernon Schryver
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Lanlan Pan
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Mukund Sivaraman
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Mukund Sivaraman
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Mukund Sivaraman
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Mukund Sivaraman
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Lanlan Pan
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Davey Song
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Lanlan Pan
- Re: [DNSOP] New Version Notification for draft-pa… Ralf Weber
- Re: [DNSOP] New Version Notification for draft-pa… Lanlan Pan
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Davey Song
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Vernon Schryver
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Vernon Schryver
- Re: [DNSOP] fragile dnssec, was Fwd: New Version John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Vernon Schryver
- Re: [DNSOP] fragile dnssec, was Fwd: New Version Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Lanlan Pan
- Re: [DNSOP] fragile dnssec, was Fwd: New Version Petr Špaček
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] fragile dnssec, was Fwd: New Version Matthew Pounsett
- Re: [DNSOP] fragile dnssec, was Fwd: New Version John R Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] New Version Notification for draft-pa… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] fragile dnssec, was Fwd: New Version John R Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] New Version Notification for draft-pa… Ralf Weber
- Re: [DNSOP] fragile dnssec, was Fwd: New Version Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] fragile dnssec, was Fwd: New Version John R Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] fragile dnssec, was Fwd: New Version Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] updating fragile dnssec, was Fwd: New… John R Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] updating fragile dnssec, was Fwd: New… Patrik Fältström
- Re: [DNSOP] New Version Notification for draft-pa… Lanlan Pan
- Re: [DNSOP] New Version Notification for draft-pa… Lanlan Pan
- Re: [DNSOP] New Version Notification for draft-pa… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] fragile dnssec, was Fwd: New Version John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] New Version Notification for draft-pa… Warren Kumari
- Re: [DNSOP] New Version Notification for draft-pa… Lanlan Pan
- Re: [DNSOP] fragile dnssec, was Fwd: New Version Petr Špaček
- Re: [DNSOP] fragile dnssec, was Fwd: New Version A. Schulze