IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] followup and proposed actions: RFC 6761 interim and next steps

Francisco Obispo <fobispo@uniregistry.com> Tue, 26 May 2015 21:38 UTC

Return-Path: <fobispo@uniregistry.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 830E91B31C0 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 May 2015 14:38:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_74=0.6, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1D_Oxuix7Egs for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 May 2015 14:38:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zimbra1.uniregistry.com (zimbra1.uniregistry.com [162.221.214.42]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 081AA1A8ACA for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 May 2015 14:38:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zimbra1.uniregistry.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra1.uniregistry.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96ABE327A78; Tue, 26 May 2015 21:38:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zimbra1.uniregistry.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra1.uniregistry.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89A90327A7B; Tue, 26 May 2015 21:38:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [64.96.164.20] (unknown [64.96.164.20]) by zimbra1.uniregistry.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D9F9E327A78; Tue, 26 May 2015 21:38:09 +0000 (UTC)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_8CF6DFE0-76C2-4437-B1DE-4DE15D81056A"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5b6
From: Francisco Obispo <fobispo@uniregistry.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.11.1505261730060.65578@ary.lan>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 14:38:06 -0700
Message-Id: <CEA65A4A-1AE4-4582-8EF2-732DEEED8D70@uniregistry.com>
References: <20150526200703.15413.qmail@ary.lan> <3B05F60A-8865-45B8-A36C-042E0F5CC92C@uniregistry.com> <alpine.OSX.2.11.1505261730060.65578@ary.lan>
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/_eoZFp6PoHytqyekuwmE9bJtQeQ>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] followup and proposed actions: RFC 6761 interim and next steps
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 21:38:14 -0000

Where are you getting the ‘thousands’ from?


> On May 26, 2015, at 2:33 PM, John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
> 
> Ah, you expect the thousands of people with printer.home all to change the domain names they use.  Could you explain, preferably in detail, how you plan to do that?



If thousands need to fix their setups, then yes.

Do you expect to write a technical document and expect the problem to be fully resolved?



Francisco Obispo
CTO - Registry Operations
____________________________

 <http://www.uniregistry.com/>
2161 San Joaquin Hills Road
Newport Beach, CA 92660

Office +1 949 706 2300 x4202
fobispo@uniregistry.link

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email