IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] followup and proposed actions: RFC 6761 interim and next steps

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Thu, 28 May 2015 19:17 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B5C21A701A for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 May 2015 12:17:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.663
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.663 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DQxn9uOKSYsS for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 May 2015 12:17:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C5301A7018 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 May 2015 12:17:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 17025 invoked from network); 28 May 2015 19:17:17 -0000
Received: from unknown (64.57.183.18) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 28 May 2015 19:17:17 -0000
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 19:16:47 -0000
Message-ID: <20150528191647.6787.qmail@ary.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <7FBF3D8B-E340-4540-A8B4-4786FB3E39C4@gmail.com>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/jbKKEomcOpvsiprvcFeDtVHcZsc>
Cc: suzworldwide@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] followup and proposed actions: RFC 6761 interim and next steps
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 19:17:12 -0000

>1. Delegating home/corp/mail in the root zone would be bad.
>2. Adding home/corp/mail to the special-use name registry would be good.

I think we should do 2.

R's,
John

PS: I agree with comments that while 1 is true, it's not directly our
department.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email