IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] on private use TLDS

Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us> Fri, 29 November 2019 00:07 UTC

Return-Path: <dougb@dougbarton.us>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E4FB120812 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Nov 2019 16:07:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=dougbarton.us
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id InDCyUilv39V for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Nov 2019 16:07:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dougbarton.us (dougbarton.us [IPv6:2607:f2f8:ab14::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FC36120227 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Nov 2019 16:07:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2600:6c50:17f:7759:b4bf:bc0a:78c5:1a15] (unknown [IPv6:2600:6c50:17f:7759:b4bf:bc0a:78c5:1a15]) by dougbarton.us (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 42C531F39 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Nov 2019 16:07:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=dougbarton.us; s=dkim; t=1574986034; bh=Vwu+D83xdU1SUDHaV/g37pQXoudTospC0IIOmv4nSxw=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=PlVQO116J9eDWsg70p5Mqj6fPJRsEusgJxwYDb+VhZODS8wl1KvCpxpVhfq4sOgwX 5RBpXMa8kzmV+yTW5fFQCJy+nmjVwlVs/H7QQSMRt3oPndVYo6J3DdluhB+q+/2FyW 6/D2HQlJkq6+QZv0HexSe4lGvRsFZAp33SR2b5JY=
To: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <20191128165507.2A60BFDF451@ary.qy> <fb307c7a-348a-03d3-3d8e-8e683cec603d@dougbarton.us> <73256f09-8083-4b36-ad1e-f82f382a0b9c@Canary> <97b59027-2a25-d44f-c9b4-d1287cc211c1@dougbarton.us> <527bc48f-b739-4de4-85b7-1d5ea7746829@Canary>
From: Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us>
Message-ID: <8796ca33-41a7-85f8-0afe-dbe8666f431b@dougbarton.us>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2019 16:07:13 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <527bc48f-b739-4de4-85b7-1d5ea7746829@Canary>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/a4egbsTX2ZNIAE48CNMa1phbQeo>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] on private use TLDS
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2019 00:07:15 -0000

Can you please explain why ICANN's work on name collision and the 
ongoing onslaught of queries at the root for un-delegated TLDs are not 
sufficient evidence?

And if not, how do you propose that we study it?

Doug


On 11/28/19 3:58 PM, Joe Abley wrote:
> Hi Doug,
> 
> I appreciate the response and I don't doubt your experience, but I do 
> think there is some value in a more robust study around some of these 
> questions. Really the prevalence of no-doubt well-informed but largely 
> unsubstantiated opinions (to the level of detail that I was trying to 
> infer) is what I am arguing we need to do better than.
> 
> 
> Joe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email