Re: [DNSOP] CPE devices doing DNSSEC

Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se> Sun, 09 March 2014 08:31 UTC

Return-Path: <paf@frobbit.se>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E565F1A0208 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Mar 2014 00:31:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.798
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.798 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JYDm4W44Kznz for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Mar 2014 00:31:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.frobbit.se (mail.frobbit.se [IPv6:2a02:80:3ffe::176]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C259A1A01F9 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 9 Mar 2014 00:31:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ix-2.local (unknown [31.55.33.169]) by mail.frobbit.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 41FFC22946; Sun, 9 Mar 2014 09:31:03 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <531C26A7.9030507@frobbit.se>
Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2014 08:30:31 +0000
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Patrik_F=E4ltstr=F6m?= <paf@frobbit.se>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>, Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
References: <20140307100524.2F42810CD58F@rock.dv.isc.org> <A0D47DA8-6E19-4A61-8A7C-FE960A0FA7E9@cybersecurity.org> <20140308090009.5E51210D1595@rock.dv.isc.org> <936947DC-9567-45FE-A7E3-BF06AB8AAE64@rfc1035.com>
In-Reply-To: <936947DC-9567-45FE-A7E3-BF06AB8AAE64@rfc1035.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vcnHtvLDr1WndhqwAmRCS47oLv4vvxODF"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/avXce9u2nMQwQ6BAQvIOS3_DFLU
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@cybersecurity.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] CPE devices doing DNSSEC
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2014 08:31:16 -0000


On 2014-03-08 11:47, Jim Reid wrote:
> Correction: some registrars are obliged to use EPP to talk to some registries.

Correction: epp is not one protocol. It is one protocol profile per
backend registry.

A big failure for IETF I must say.

The architecture is broken, but, luckily IETF has now thanks to many
people started to work on this issue.

   Patrik