Re: [DNSOP] pushing updates to the parent

Joe Abley <> Fri, 07 March 2014 15:39 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 384E51A0294 for <>; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 07:39:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7IaVYpW4KNYY for <>; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 07:39:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::233]) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E0141A0281 for <>; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 07:39:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by with SMTP id x48so5022268wes.24 for <>; Fri, 07 Mar 2014 07:39:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=google; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=rJSyT0sw8gJF6WHb9UZ1MRBD35eeRVxiOUj3ssYZRs8=; b=Vw28oJH7knsjXreUhlU8GxTK/NJOPU5Hvlxt+hBjQddWTmzfmILbHG48sS3bXt5+9b RtyCilxC/PNC7IlHsCpAH53YKnQTb/PWLAMuZqYIFHs46vzTMk3WKIfi70do4b/V2QzH vQi6CWz45Aq/VdeXiOoa2GDqlG+OqlJ79eKdM=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to; bh=rJSyT0sw8gJF6WHb9UZ1MRBD35eeRVxiOUj3ssYZRs8=; b=OSZuIic8VyQIbGSXwUZo4lUPLLj2/NMfTMjX92QricxcQF9RniI1eyH+qKLTUjJw1j 1aRbCc3eFAjaJ5uhA4yimMViSDYmJ1VC39UehBfEp8Kr/w9WTT4OM0H1S6diar+LB0J5 XCga7sJx+q701sLvUVyEKlz4gXz8HWKcTSJvmNkDYAo2J1wDzsqDLdWCmBIio1qF1wri 65qm0vmhBbKUy3qoOW2WoxnuYNJoH5Qq4afrcsZYOb5bwI3ICS4we8feNjTlEV0/1bDf 5CdJdhpyf4UHgkkwBJ/8+M5Q/4fGx9GKc91L9hgabpaRq2fLk1+P9ckEVBVfYjmWRvfw gyHw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlVkai18eGkFmoUEVjmBBMn6pfH+OJH8XA+OccSDmgmyXepAtbuifOEV6ZEGi3QnWnFHGfQ
X-Received: by with SMTP id fx9mr20061936wjc.56.1394206780518; Fri, 07 Mar 2014 07:39:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ([2001:67c:370:160:c13c:3593:6e5a:ca90]) by with ESMTPSA id ci4sm11333859wjc.21.2014. for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 07 Mar 2014 07:39:39 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
From: Joe Abley <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2014 15:39:37 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <>
References: <> <> <>
To: Tony Finch <>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] pushing updates to the parent
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 15:39:47 -0000

On 7 Mar 2014, at 10:49, Tony Finch <> wrote:

> Joe Abley <> wrote:
> So from the standards development point of view, I think what this is
> saying is that success is more likely to come from building on what people
> are already doing and nudging more of them to do it more similarly.

Sure, maybe.

I think we have to consider our target audience. Part of that is to consider the existing menagerie and understanding the shape of the expected solutions space.

While we in this group might find comfort in arcane binary protocols using UDP port 53, the habits of people who frequent the dyndns zoo seem to be far more tilted towards throwing JSON documents around over HTTP. It's hard to imagine unifying a pile of RESTish APIs with something that looks foreign and different.

I'll +1 Andrew and say that I have my doubts (a) that the underscore scaffolding will ever appear in the top-most labels and (b) that anybody would use them if they did.

My poorly-informed doubt is hardly a reason not to document the idea. But I think it's a stretch to expect anything more than an XKCD-927 result.