IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] RFC 6761 discussion (“special names”)

hellekin <hellekin@gnu.org> Wed, 18 March 2015 12:40 UTC

Return-Path: <hellekin@gnu.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 663D61A00DF for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 05:40:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.611
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.611 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ftbmxpvjx-_r for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 05:40:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:4830:134:3::e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 096D51A00CD for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 05:40:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ol168-138.fibertel.com.ar ([24.232.138.168]:32925 helo=raiz.hellekin.gnu) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <hellekin@gnu.org>) id 1YYDGb-0008Pj-E0 for dnsop@ietf.org; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 08:40:09 -0400
Message-ID: <55097218.2060208@gnu.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 09:39:52 -0300
From: hellekin <hellekin@gnu.org>
Organization: https://gnu.org/consensus
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <55089F07.5020200@gmail.com> <201503181101.t2IB1LBL099870@bela.nlnetlabs.nl>
In-Reply-To: <201503181101.t2IB1LBL099870@bela.nlnetlabs.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/eApDvivfNHT7tzYS6ykQlmGpsL0>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] RFC 6761 discussion (“special names”)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 12:40:14 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 03/18/15 08:01, Jaap Akkerhuis wrote:
> 
> Following this discussion from a distance, I cannot help wondering
> whether this is special names stuff might in violate RFC 2860 section 4.3.
>
*** Assignment of special names belongs to "assignment of domain names
for technical use" according to that section.  Do you read it differently?

==
hk

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJVCXICXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w
ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRFQ0IyNkIyRTNDNzEyMTc2OUEzNEM4ODU0
ODA2QzM2M0ZDMTg5ODNEAAoJEEgGw2P8GJg9nukP/ikl8/kSob/+tEdkmy2W/rxa
gaNmPtkvKSnFxOhHLNL2aUf0M23b/mJXJkVzX42PupqOpKX8aLIp/pb6Zb+XZMR8
As4eA6Xs6XaO/deoLTGVy0ihMpECtwrdk+FD1P+cWkgTzaTZajrRDakYiUwlJ8nq
dMkaStxakHp+K9+Xt66enxTw8J7JmqKFxTQppumdpRvE/CsyJ3tBOeQOz7h4yInZ
KSuRXCSB5Odi0OqTUPu18Egsu6l5RlesnVHobCkq6USp6Ctc+udFqrSpyOivzRzJ
N3lIFk19snovxZUDx47TpNW2bXW1eTDGv2rMqgia+HUl1K1ZhgF7vy6/C+89XUv9
CoLZB9DjVk2Ej/d7/jfWclK6h9/YsMElne2Tny70uTQJF3MU8s9E3NJGxy8cO3Xb
oVc8Iu6wRVfQyi4EJBJ6HsMNRtkxtlqz+3oDoQSVU7WZQTqpTuVXGFWNThp3vjC1
EgrlHT3EG6xjpoKoBwjRWmoyVUSg7m7UoUgsxWGKNAuGcrIaojhA/qDswFQ1YdrO
21oCyTM6YQ4XSwMgqRcyIRNe2NCQJMXHNcYvagW8IM46FjpSgZ6kXFjXPzxmrSx8
V6QP4ct6k3zC6qRiwcfsAD2kt/p9gZSfTmlEEZIq9a5v3T5HIP7wjZEr9nBpzWoJ
na+Wl6rJg0hQKxrebcCX
=7T7q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email