Re: [DNSOP] RFC 6761 discussion (“special names”)

hellekin <hellekin@gnu.org> Tue, 17 March 2015 23:54 UTC

Return-Path: <hellekin@gnu.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ED7F1A1BD9 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 16:54:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.611
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.611 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q_kJrM6pH0EJ for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 16:54:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:4830:134:3::e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 554D41A1B1C for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 16:54:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ol168-138.fibertel.com.ar ([24.232.138.168]:55561 helo=raiz.hellekin.gnu) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <hellekin@gnu.org>) id 1YY1JN-0006d3-4U for dnsop@ietf.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 19:54:13 -0400
Message-ID: <5508BE90.2020507@gnu.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 20:53:52 -0300
From: hellekin <hellekin@gnu.org>
Organization: https://gnu.org/consensus
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <55089F07.5020200@gmail.com> <5508A1FA.6050108@gnu.org> <DF8C73AD-70F6-4412-A3F4-D7938CB54108@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <DF8C73AD-70F6-4412-A3F4-D7938CB54108@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/n4nqb0UKKO2c6UIQA6_ltdDfjXI>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] RFC 6761 discussion (“special names”)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 23:54:19 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

> 
> Do you have feedback on the idea of an interim meeting for DNSOP to address 
> these drafts in more depth
>
*** Thank you Suzanne for your clarification.

My only feedback is that such meeting is very welcome.  I hope the
discussion will be fruitful and will enable DNSOP to get things done
with these drafts.

Would you please share the list of drafts for completeness?

Thank you for your attention,

==
hk

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=lEY+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----