IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] RFC 6761 discussion (“special names”)

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Wed, 18 March 2015 15:19 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49A9D1A1A9F for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 08:19:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.047
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.047 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XR54hiqIWbHI for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 08:19:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from proper.com (Opus1.Proper.COM [207.182.41.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FDF31A1A96 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 08:19:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.101] (50-1-51-95.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.51.95]) (authenticated bits=0) by proper.com (8.15.1/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id t2IFJqx5094865 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 08:19:53 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: proper.com: Host 50-1-51-95.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.51.95] claimed to be [10.20.30.101]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\))
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <55089F07.5020200@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 08:19:52 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <92DFEF4B-91CD-4051-83FA-5DB7AD213355@vpnc.org>
References: <55089F07.5020200@gmail.com>
To: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/vWb1VxPNVFgZGrzdNKXCaLMEUTU>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] RFC 6761 discussion (“special names”)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 15:19:54 -0000

On Mar 17, 2015, at 2:39 PM, Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> Accordingly, we are tentatively planning a Virtual Interim Meeting to dive a little deeper on the special names drafts, including possible architectural implications of the apparent increase in interest in RFC 6761, as we attempt to muddle through the questions we’ve seen and the ones we anticipate.

Yes, please. The discussion on this list so far has been more about policy, not about DNS operations. That is, there has been very little discussion of the operational aspects of RFC 6761 in the new proposals, just whether the naming policy is being followed. Therefore, separating this out from the rest of the discussion in Dallas seems like a good way to get those most interested in the topic in one place at one time.

--Paul Hoffman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email