Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-problem-01
"Adrien de Croy" <adrien@qbik.com> Wed, 30 March 2016 04:38 UTC
Return-Path: <adrien@qbik.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87E5D12DCE5 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 21:38:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IZ9aak6uS90b for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 21:38:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.qbik.com (smtp.qbik.com [122.56.26.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9018E12DC6D for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 21:38:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: From [192.168.1.146] (unverified [192.168.1.146]) by SMTP Server [192.168.1.3] (WinGate SMTP Receiver v8.5.6 (Build 4877)) with SMTP id <0000685742@smtp.qbik.com>; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 17:38:03 +1300
From: Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 04:38:03 +0000
Message-Id: <em8db5dc2e-8bce-461b-9982-359b9df7c443@bodybag>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.11.1603292212470.42318@ary.lan>
User-Agent: eM_Client/6.0.24928.0
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/f7DedGea9hk5z4Qz6pj25idL8QE>
Cc: "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-problem-01
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 04:38:09 -0000
Just looking at the justification for all of this from that draft which quotes RFC2826 "To remain a global network, the Internet requires the existence of a globally unique public name space. The DNS name space is a hierarchical name space derived from a single, globally unique root." "Maintaining a globally-unique public namespace that supports different name resolution protocols is hence an architectural requirement, and some facility for reservation of top-level requirement, and some facility for reservation of top-level domains in the DNS is necessary." I couldn't even find the second para in RFC2826 (search didn't yield it), neither does it follow logically from the first paragraph in any case. Google finds the second para only in the problem statement which quotes it from RFC2826. Maybe it was in an earlier draft of 2826, but I'd still expect it to be in google somewhere. Is this the justification for having an extensible registry of special names? Cheers Adrien ------ Original Message ------ From: "John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> To: "Adrien de Croy" <adrien@qbik.com> Cc: "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org> Sent: 30/03/2016 3:17:07 p.m. Subject: Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-problem-01 >>>I have to say I'm startled to see that people here aren't aware that >>>.onion is entirely handled in applications. >> >>a google search for "DNS .onion leaks" comes up with many links, many >>relating to reported bugs in browsers. > >Yeah, that's why it'd be nice if the DNS resolver rejected them rather >than telling the world what you were trying to look for in .onion land. > >>So I don't know if we can truly claim that resolvers are being >>shielded from .onion by the applications. Maybe it's better now, it >>would be interesting if Symantec were to update this. > >They aren't. That's why it'd be nice to make that bug less leaky. > >>>don't leak into the DNS. The only thing that anyone's asking DNS >>>developers to do is to fail .onion requests rather than forwarding >>>them along. >>That's the problem. Creating new requirements for DNS developers to >>do anything at all is a huge problem. > >It's not a requirement. It's a request. I expect it's a lot easier >than whatever you have to do to deal with .local. If we adopt .alt, >you can stub that out too and with any luck you're done. > >>Having said that, I wish there was a way with a single DNS lookup one >>could resolve both/either IPv4 and/or IPv6 addresses from a name with >>a single query (e.g. the "give me any version address" query), rather >>than having to make 2 lookups and fail over etc. Would basically >>halve the amount of DNS traffic on the network and resolve a lot of >>pathological cases. > >Surely you've been reading the draft-vavrusa-dnsop-aaaa-for-free >thread. > >R's, >John > >_______________________________________________ >DNSOP mailing list >DNSOP@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
- [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-problem-… Alain Durand
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… Bob Harold
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… Ralph Droms
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… David Conrad
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… Ralph Droms
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… Alain Durand
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… Ralph Droms
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… David Conrad
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… David Conrad
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… Alain Durand
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… Ralph Droms
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… Adrien de Croy
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… Suzanne Woolf
- [DNSOP] The right alt string (was Re: draft-adpkj… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… Alain Durand
- Re: [DNSOP] The right alt string (was Re: draft-a… John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [DNSOP] The right alt string (was Re: draft-a… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… David Conrad
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… David Conrad
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… Alain Durand
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… Ralph Droms
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… Alain Durand
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… Paul Wouters
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… George Michaelson
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… John R Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… Alain Durand
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… Suzanne Woolf
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… David Conrad
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… David Conrad
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… joel jaeggli
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… David Conrad
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… George Michaelson
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… joel jaeggli
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… John R Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… Jim Reid
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… Philip Homburg
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… Alain Durand
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… John R Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… Philip Homburg
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… Suzanne Woolf
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… George Michaelson
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… Adrien de Croy
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… Adrien de Croy
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… Adrien de Croy
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… John R Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… Adrien de Croy
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… Patrik Fältström
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… Adrien de Croy
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… Philip Homburg
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… David Conrad
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… Adrien de Croy
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… Ralph Droms
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… David Conrad
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… Adrien de Croy
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… Adrien de Croy
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… str4d
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… George Michaelson
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… str4d
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… joel jaeggli
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… Robert Edmonds
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… Adrien de Croy
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-prob… Adrien de Croy