Re: [DNSOP] New Version Notification for draft-hardaker-rfc5011-security-considerations-02.txt

Bob Harold <rharolde@umich.edu> Mon, 06 February 2017 14:17 UTC

Return-Path: <rharolde@umich.edu>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3C9B129DA3 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 06:17:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=umich.edu
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ljNYfKA6vsVm for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 06:17:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yb0-x233.google.com (mail-yb0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c09::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F7FA129DB1 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 06:17:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yb0-x233.google.com with SMTP id o65so25694332ybo.2 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 06 Feb 2017 06:17:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=umich.edu; s=google-2016-06-03; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=o8gMjDLk+GaY6jGbkrEQ0OIWfgDoicD5lMV/QIeSJNw=; b=eOK+Jre4mtNUplF/G3zG68KrUuUqsjy7wAJIeyI3t5m2viTsi6S9vz9rg2rxRjloQb L3IypniZ3d1+S5mX7dU0vrjg+4x2IRuNtn0yQ2F9I2WS3cGceWLIWsXCMmNop+mIkcDZ VWzXcwQE7g5MLTB79Lm+J9mqkj8dcaQEiD8KO0gLgtIMcjhu2ZnI5Z9FjPHBKMmBenho 3HPsejrij1vabjAT2AjSgdK/jIGOi/yZlytqd3gpc43z8evccq+3DbH6K2Whe5viDHaO BofSzEtL+iAxtyCM+0/xc5ayJFt4iont6fv7DdZhv7G0E3Zhg/OFmkApPPBLlJIY6uj1 c/UA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=o8gMjDLk+GaY6jGbkrEQ0OIWfgDoicD5lMV/QIeSJNw=; b=Gu2oGHy+JimG0KjdGNQRYqve54Y5EOnLgXX5fgb7Pe2CoZQ3rHYB86bfdUt13w0Ar5 2K8rKlBi4C6a8LbN+smzvtHQwUm5LLW0igMPh7xo6nkO1PCU+Lh9BrRbEWyRjQon3MQf IQHrR1N0IAcTNxMt0YjzBKyO3uqlh1kkAzEs4xRAN/OtLD1VLkP+JOSaNDGZDqmhB3ax uWgGmyoFZAO1t8yO3VLXkh6b5K+hZ0LE40OS+um6Nqxt8jaU12TuTZheBgHAqhsG6Yns njzrJXqaJi2yvoflx1UD65Amm+TCsDfPXiow1EYy1WLIa5Uj1UN7VxnuKrqHnOHC42F/ v14w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39kiaTMWc6E9Al2IdGjEkydd0mRRiZKj7GvdtYO2/lLe6qeMZU33OSm6wHhxqHZB1RBeBylUBJD85QzGg0CY
X-Received: by 10.37.162.40 with SMTP id b37mr960774ybi.142.1486390665625; Mon, 06 Feb 2017 06:17:45 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.13.237.68 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 06:17:45 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_iKYkZNG=JLSUbCVpsrmkupFM6635eMHJsQXDWcLJmLgKQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <148616456120.4133.8494448927223938318.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAHw9_iKYkZNG=JLSUbCVpsrmkupFM6635eMHJsQXDWcLJmLgKQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Bob Harold <rharolde@umich.edu>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 09:17:45 -0500
Message-ID: <CA+nkc8BaYbb_GDzLPk76wHPEGaqXEez9Fvr9evkY3utyMGr-vw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c198ec29f91f60547dd4be3
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/lt105NZpDGJihCoW6O-q3ZcIBdY>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] New Version Notification for draft-hardaker-rfc5011-security-considerations-02.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2017 14:17:55 -0000

On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 9:14 PM, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Was and I have updated this document to make it clearer and more
> readable. Please take a read and let us know if any parts are unclear,
> if you have any other feedback, etc.
>
> Is this close to done?
> W
>
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 6:29 PM,  <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote:
> >
> > A new version of I-D, draft-hardaker-rfc5011-
> security-considerations-02.txt
> > has been successfully submitted by Warren Kumari and posted to the
> > IETF repository.
> >
> > Name:           draft-hardaker-rfc5011-security-considerations
> > Revision:       02
> > Title:          Security Considerations for RFC5011 Publishers
> > Document date:  2017-02-02
> > Group:          Individual Submission
> > Pages:          8
> > URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-
> drafts/draft-hardaker-rfc5011-security-considerations-02.txt
> > Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hardaker-rfc5011-
> security-considerations/
> > Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hardaker-rfc5011-
> security-considerations-02
> > Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?
> url2=draft-hardaker-rfc5011-security-considerations-02
> >
> > Abstract:
> >    This document describes the math behind the minimum time-length that
> >    a DNS zone publisher must wait before using a new DNSKEY to sign
> >    records when supporting the RFC5011 rollover strategies.
> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>


Thanks for your work on this.  Some minor formatting issues:

Table of contents:
sections 5 and 5.1 have large blank space in middle
(as formatted at
https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-hardaker-rfc5011-security-considerations-02.txt
)
section 8 is wrapped unnecessarily

Section 3:
large space in first line

Section 5:
"poising" -> "poisoning"

Section 5.1.1
"(a new)" -> "(anew)"

Section 6
47 - 35 = 12 days (not 11)?

-- 
Bob Harold