IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] ALT-TLD and (insecure) delgations.

Ólafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com> Mon, 06 February 2017 15:30 UTC

Return-Path: <ogud@ogud.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA7C3127076 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 07:30:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.787
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.787 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-1.887, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XUC4lVjJCpeG for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 07:30:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp117.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (smtp117.ord1c.emailsrvr.com [108.166.43.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 181F6129E41 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 07:30:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp7.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp7.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 76DB9A0186; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 10:30:06 -0500 (EST)
X-Auth-ID: ogud@ogud.com
Received: by smtp7.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: ogud-AT-ogud.com) with ESMTPSA id E07D5A02F2; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 10:30:01 -0500 (EST)
X-Sender-Id: ogud@ogud.com
Received: from [IPv6:2607:fb90:91e:147c:7a5e:1b92:696c:f8b3] ([UNAVAILABLE]. [172.56.21.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 0.0.0.0:465 (trex/5.7.12); Mon, 06 Feb 2017 10:30:06 -0500
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2017 09:29:58 -0600
User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android
In-Reply-To: <CAPt1N1m2mowdCF6igU0TN-FCcjas9AaY-uGma4HgPGKx0Jg4Tw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <6391B5BB-19BD-4717-B9BB-ECD145F7B4F6@fugue.com> <20170206040516.1701.qmail@ary.lan> <CAPt1N1mbzhS19G_uDA8HokVxXuHy5uA7F1c84-1yUUpqZ2ifJQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.OSX.2.20.1702052315130.13902@ary.qy> <CAPt1N1m2mowdCF6igU0TN-FCcjas9AaY-uGma4HgPGKx0Jg4Tw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----12591QIFVKSWFOSQJOGNZ7KEWKGKMT"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: dnsop@ietf.org, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>, John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
From: Ólafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com>
Message-ID: <4E481C14-1C2B-4A18-A4F2-582208C1DDE3@ogud.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/BSlyYS45iO2tLMFZE90QDwVpg_M>
Cc: dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] ALT-TLD and (insecure) delgations.
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2017 15:30:13 -0000

Ted,

What RFC are you referring to?

Why do you think .ARPA is for services?
It's for infrastructure and homenet wants to join the infrastructure.

It is waste of time arguing if name A or B is better take the one you can get faster.

Ólafur


On February 5, 2017 10:22:35 PM CST, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:
>The working group has consensus to give it a try.  We may change our
>minds
>of it takes too long, but it seems worth exploring from a process
>perspective anyway.
>
>On Feb 5, 2017 11:18 PM, "John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm pretty sure I've explained it enough times on this mailing list
>and in
>>> the relevant documents by now. If you don't agree, maybe we should
>just
>>> accept that. If you don't remember the explanation, it's in the
>homenet
>>> naming architecture doc I wrote.
>>>
>>
>> Well, OK, I took another look, and from what I can see, it's a belief
>that
>> people will find toaster.homenet.arpa harder or more confusing to
>type than
>> toaster.homenet.
>>
>> Just out of curiosity, how long is it worth waiting to get .homenet
>rather
>> than .homenet.arpa?  If it took five more years, which at the current
>rate
>> seems optimistic, would homenet still be relevant?
>>
>> R's,
>> John
>>

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status