IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] ALT-TLD and (insecure) delgations.

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Sat, 04 February 2017 01:55 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D71871295E8 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 17:55:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nkwclqp33k7z for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 17:55:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt0-x22d.google.com (mail-qt0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A466129464 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 17:55:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id x49so62769758qtc.2 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 03 Feb 2017 17:55:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=gxsM601qYfZjTGaWIU6zezdysKKwqVNcdnJI9PhE+bI=; b=axTu5Xze4+tzF+rKBWxnxdUe+7ujYPe9HW4qem+EqRxk6myR+XLdUcHo/L/C3/dMjH 6bsXzhBF9i9o2sLOwGhqFfj6bo/Je74kg8s1jaDJVYw5jBbhfFjN5t7qQ4qQmiQXbw1i LXSy16hwzYoIwTcnI1zJAVL7uI8be65TjFMQGqFax/Byj4bhGhBHVb7rWTqjkz1simTf K40AfQY73Vq8Nkh1JZAwSil1Vy5UTdMJBexQIKiS1WpudPprrO3dgYLwrNA8RTmHj+vC r5/lAazsSZ2gFlI26W7FbJXFV+Z469X81i5c7MWyeVMUUS94cVBYaFX3P31ZEWi9MSWy QLsA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=gxsM601qYfZjTGaWIU6zezdysKKwqVNcdnJI9PhE+bI=; b=A09rO01LfF+3uyQB+UPmaFtHOA+glWTFUeVJQmO4xDbH3l+fnlgA2QtChaa8zv/pM5 xv42MzaDR2MT4ZeGfAaAtQZgYArFBEkgWfRYhtH+W52AxlLH0KfkXuj9nzbkeFoYgrzK 9Xw+iryd8yju/2uxjH6QIu3sbyhCsruqJF3qZpGiDlpYkb+aw3cJ/rl6v/7UNDy6/+6q s+5p9YRh+U9gGclRobTGHgicqyaHzfCl8wr0G0DJRr890wCPGgMzAi7wfB/UdQBU7vq9 uz7vupGB6dffk4FvCBDBw86jRNiYyv/HXewUYAONi0aenpNjtpT1GySCpJDuP8DuDEHi GBSg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39nQkeFqfTEZxjRO/KCiGtEhQpp3NG9hrY9oPXNWqPokk2wUaenMvfeiRisiyv4qRQ==
X-Received: by 10.200.48.136 with SMTP id v8mr43951qta.200.1486173301708; Fri, 03 Feb 2017 17:55:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.20.229] (c-73-167-64-188.hsd1.nh.comcast.net. [73.167.64.188]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m12sm26166031qtm.45.2017.02.03.17.55.00 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 03 Feb 2017 17:55:00 -0800 (PST)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <5BB1A3F5-5EFB-4164-9720-68E262E58636@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_5A786E8F-62C9-43DD-8A60-5180BF50291F"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2017 20:54:59 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20170204015158.GB67739@mx2.yitter.info>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
References: <CAHw9_i+8PA3FQx8FqW-xQ_96it7k-g5UrMB7fxARUi1gwQ++hw@mail.gmail.com> <20170201204455.6nymmjlj5lzq2ect@mycre.ws> <CAHw9_iJ50jWgsAe+hRKUtubfAtpt7+GEeCKEASzypcf86+4nYA@mail.gmail.com> <20170204015158.GB67739@mx2.yitter.info>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/AjvHaI92ZG7e1geSS6IchZvQMiQ>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] ALT-TLD and (insecure) delgations.
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2017 01:55:04 -0000

On Feb 3, 2017, at 8:51 PM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:
> If the resolver "has a local zone for alt" -- I think this means it is
> authoritative for that zone -- why would it ask the root about it at
> all?

This is a rehash of the .homenet discussion we had a few weeks ago.   As long as the stub resolver isn't validating, it's no problem. If it is validating, then the recursive resolver can't fool the stub resolver if there's a secure denial of existence.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email