IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] ALT-TLD and (insecure) delgations.

Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com> Mon, 06 February 2017 02:51 UTC

Return-Path: <ogud@ogud.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9A15129A92 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Feb 2017 18:51:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.288
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.288 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-1.887, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6mbHCzudMAMY for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Feb 2017 18:51:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp69.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (smtp69.iad3a.emailsrvr.com [173.203.187.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B92CD1294AD for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 5 Feb 2017 18:51:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp1.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 668A45DD1; Sun, 5 Feb 2017 21:51:18 -0500 (EST)
X-Auth-ID: ogud@ogud.com
Received: by smtp1.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: ogud-AT-ogud.com) with ESMTPSA id 474565B9B; Sun, 5 Feb 2017 21:51:09 -0500 (EST)
X-Sender-Id: ogud@ogud.com
Received: from [10.20.30.43] (pool-71-191-33-181.washdc.fios.verizon.net [71.191.33.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 0.0.0.0:587 (trex/5.7.12); Sun, 05 Feb 2017 21:51:18 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
From: Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com>
In-Reply-To: <0c9ea76d-a541-943a-d72e-bfe255d57259@bellis.me.uk>
Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2017 21:51:11 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <E6555513-ED55-4A3B-AC8D-D1E74B65FE3A@ogud.com>
References: <CAHw9_i+8PA3FQx8FqW-xQ_96it7k-g5UrMB7fxARUi1gwQ++hw@mail.gmail.com> <20170201204455.6nymmjlj5lzq2ect@mycre.ws> <CAHw9_iJ50jWgsAe+hRKUtubfAtpt7+GEeCKEASzypcf86+4nYA@mail.gmail.com> <20170204015158.GB67739@mx2.yitter.info> <5BB1A3F5-5EFB-4164-9720-68E262E58636@fugue.com> <20170204021353.GF67739@mx2.yitter.info> <0c9ea76d-a541-943a-d72e-bfe255d57259@bellis.me.uk>
To: Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/VSo1ccPheXKUKUt9ovCQm3On2Cw>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] ALT-TLD and (insecure) delgations.
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2017 02:51:23 -0000

> On Feb 4, 2017, at 4:46 AM, Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 04/02/2017 02:13, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
>> Right, that's always been the problem with using this _for the DNS_.
>> Homenet has no choice in that, because the whole point of the homenet
>> name is precisely to enable in-homenet DNS without reference to the
>> global DNS.  I think you're quite correct that we need to decide
>> whether alt is to be used for those purposes.  I'm not convinced
>> that's so useful.
> 
> If it turns out that we can't get the insecure delegation that we need
> for .homenet, then I'd (personally) be reasonably happy with
> .homenet.alt, except that the current proposals for the use of .alt
> wouldn't seem to permit that.
> 
> Ray

What is wrong with homenet.arpa ? 
you can have that next month and no-one will complain 

Olafur

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email