IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] New draft for ALIAS/ANAME type

"Peter van Dijk" <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com> Fri, 31 March 2017 16:41 UTC

Return-Path: <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6970D128B88 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 09:41:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xi9KaaLQ5FU8 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 09:41:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shannon.7bits.nl (shannon.7bits.nl [89.188.0.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 622DD12988C for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 09:41:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.137.1] (unknown [IPv6:2001:610:666:0:4835:5d5f:ecfb:87d3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: peter) by shannon.7bits.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0B86CCDCF6; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 18:41:24 +0200 (CEST)
From: Peter van Dijk <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 18:41:23 +0200
Message-ID: <83692DBD-6C9B-4DBA-A181-EC52C0FF26D8@powerdns.com>
In-Reply-To: <30419b09-669c-1d3a-1e11-92b46bb4c889@gmail.com>
References: <20170331153357.6888.qmail@ary.lan> <30419b09-669c-1d3a-1e11-92b46bb4c889@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.6r5347)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/pEybbRkHVBWYlYf9gneL3PIt1CU>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] New draft for ALIAS/ANAME type
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 16:41:38 -0000

On 31 Mar 2017, at 17:54, Tim Wicinski wrote:

> On 3/31/17 10:33 AM, John Levine wrote:
>
>>
>> Now we're back to the same issue I raised with BULK.  Everyone now 
>> has
>> to carefully check what features are supported by all of their
>> secondary servers, as opposed to now where I don't even know or care
>> what software they use.  Some of us hoped we got over that once 
>> DNSSEC
>> got into the mainstream auth servers.
>>
>
> This is already happening. I can't slave zones between third party 
> vendors if I use any of their specialized features (Such as ALIAS 
> records), let alone any Geo Directional features.  We're way past that 
> now.

Tim, thanks, this is the voice of reality. Our hope is that we can 
reduce this pain by one point by standardising ALIAS/ANAME.

Kind regards,
-- 
Peter van Dijk
PowerDNS.COM BV - https://www.powerdns.com/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email