Re: [DNSOP] New draft for ALIAS/ANAME type

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Tue, 04 April 2017 03:13 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABBF31270A7 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Apr 2017 20:13:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PFue-bIkBI0a for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Apr 2017 20:13:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:2a03:6000:1004:1::68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0F76126C22 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Apr 2017 20:13:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3vxvDr6nBnz2pF; Tue, 4 Apr 2017 05:13:16 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1491275597; bh=aBtO4frDuNoWmMtNWaH2Td5nvoZj6/Stjj2L99XOWbk=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=DNXYCXIhwUsMZrodQPsGnsv8lD0dBqs+OiVocoxRwDymn8ECUCIXE98qpKak6cSmN 5SGkhpNmiTrNWV7PtC6fXBrNzvANJbWxfddmrrlF7o6tgNvUVZlQSCBtr36eYNeWLa E0kQq3EgAOFSVV2/9NaUhwQpYKrexoSVJq3HkWZk=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3hmBv3G48g8P; Tue, 4 Apr 2017 05:13:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [76.10.157.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Tue, 4 Apr 2017 05:13:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DF0D23943A4; Mon, 3 Apr 2017 23:13:13 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 bofh.nohats.ca DF0D23943A4
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC57D414493E; Mon, 3 Apr 2017 23:13:13 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2017 23:13:13 -0400 (EDT)
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Evan Hunt <each@isc.org>
cc: Dan York <york@isoc.org>, "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <20170403222531.GB72941@isc.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.20.999.1704032312020.24659@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <CA+nkc8Bwc6eQz6YPAnMLNjvHm4POLTyvsTRQC5Pn+R4iTzaB-g@mail.gmail.com> <20170330230806.6273.qmail@ary.lan> <20170330231358.GA92307@isc.org> <3A4E2834-2BD4-4DC3-9D5A-A15B3DCDA738@isoc.org> <alpine.LRH.2.20.999.1704031546230.16478@bofh.nohats.ca> <20170403222531.GB72941@isc.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20.999 (LRH 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/atNJ4uKrQmm-IXQ0hT7frBiO0MM>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] New draft for ALIAS/ANAME type
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2017 03:13:24 -0000

On Mon, 3 Apr 2017, Evan Hunt wrote:

> I said what now?  Had I recently had dental surgery?  I don't remember
> this.

Sorry about misremembering what you said.

> (I do believe an authoritative server should be *able* to operate without
> built-in recursive code

> But I definitely wouldn't phrase that as "there should not be any code".)

I'll await the new draft :)

Paul