Re: [DNSOP] Minimum viable ANAME

[Matthijs Mekking <[e-mail]>]

That was me on the mic.

To clarify:

DNS open source implementers discussed it earlier this week to see if 
there is still appetite for ANAME. The last draft did not see a lot of 
comments. To get things moving again we thought it might be a good idea 
to make a document with reduced scope.

Matthijs


On 3/26/19 4:17 PM, Dan York wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> On Mar 26, 2019, at 3:35 PM, Olli Vanhoja <[e-mail] 
>> <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
>>
>> Did someone say that there will be a side meeting about mvp ANAME
>> during this week? If so, I couldn't find that from the calendar.
> 
> I believe it was a comment from someone at the mic that the *authors* 
> were going to have a side meeting to talk about simplifying the draft 
> and providing a new version.
> 
> If it is a larger meeting than just the authors, then there are probably 
> a number of us who would be interested.
> 
> Dan
> 
> --
> Dan York
> Director of Web Strategy, Internet Society
> [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>   [phone]
> Jabber: york@jabber..isoc.org <mailto:[e-mail]>  
> Skype: danyork http://twitter.com/danyork
> 
> http://www.internetsociety.org/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>