IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] WGLC: Requirements for Management of Name Servers for the DNS

SM <sm@resistor.net> Sun, 22 March 2009 20:42 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 501B83A6A3D for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Mar 2009 13:42:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.611
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.611 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.012, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8oQPXJjC0oFG for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Mar 2009 13:42:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ns1.qubic.net (ns1.qubic.net [208.69.177.116]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B1503A6A21 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 Mar 2009 13:42:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from subman.resistor.net ([10.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.qubic.net (8.14.4.Alpha0/8.14.4.Alpha0) with ESMTP id n2MKhViv013029 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 Mar 2009 13:43:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1237754619; x=1237841019; bh=9n+TC3MpdV5p0bhUrvyvOD9T5fqvFTnkolKb1/Kbcq8=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type:Cc; b=13x2eo3tWzDGkRoKIXvMpiZRj4JCbdGz69psp4dlUE2UNN0sTDfR6PdtaOhLSuXda 9wtX6IwQgyGEpvXu7HUaRdWieee1Wq7FrRDDWo8PhltAu6vpkh4xlGS7JcG+eJbrZV eOCKJmcWxJ2K0gOGp6AIQpUI9ArVSdnU249DLi74=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=mail; d=resistor.net; c=simple; q=dns; b=L7FDBusEqql4y2YebYVKGEhvBVuE5VHBEDo4gtROnxwQkGd7UfU+uJNDbB9MnTcmK JpJBOTVW8nMeonswU4xTyVpUnWCj19xFGTff/SS4/he7/MpPFFvvr8yfQUmmAR+VK71 PLLiDPtQao+Ggdnw94USShXSRUSoIhPURu41Mn0=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20090322125244.028cefd8@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 13:42:39 -0700
To: IETF DNSOP WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <20090318163132.GA8085@unknown.office.denic.de>
References: <20090318163132.GA8085@unknown.office.denic.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] WGLC: Requirements for Management of Name Servers for the DNS
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 20:42:53 -0000

At 09:31 18-03-2009, Peter Koch wrote:
>this is to initiate a working group last call on
>
>         "Requirements for Management of Name Servers for the DNS"
>         draft-ietf-dnsop-name-server-management-reqs-02.txt

 From the Abstract:

   "Management of name servers for the Domain Name Service (DNS) has
    traditionally been done using vendor-specific monitoring,
    configuration and control methods."

Shouldn't that be Domain Name System?  That's what DNS stands for in 
RFC 1034.  "Domain Name Service" could be changed throughout the 
document to "Domain Name System".  There are several places in the 
document where "DNS service" is used.

In Section 2.1.2

   "Finding and managing large quantities of name servers would be a useful
    feature of the resulting  management solution."

I suggest "a large number" instead of large quantities".

Regards,
-sm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email