IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] A conversational description of sentinel.

Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net> Fri, 02 February 2018 00:48 UTC

Return-Path: <gih@apnic.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1733C12E878 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Feb 2018 16:48:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.921
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.921 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=apnic.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OLyY2BkQE6pv for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Feb 2018 16:48:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from APC01-HK2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-hk2apc01on0059.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.124.59]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D25AD12E049 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Feb 2018 16:48:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=apnic.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-apnic-net; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=LP5avGIZuVhvpaq6aa0KytKXc+l8hktipTjsnZQb8eo=; b=bniqxQ6nWZF/FQJtT9hvOSfx2ha8XdMsXqGbAccn4kLXkaaTm28F8jNFHyDFp38dmzqVitGyDCs7HHo7dsY7aMBxMa0rgF2Mwb4gkq3NUREM1OZdq0YyIJfpw0+Gwg1y32Yh0/BMovhkGZg9ZEYqIVZ/eZ3sWai1XN7gBkGAjhs=
Authentication-Results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=gih@apnic.net;
Received: from [IPv6:2001:388:1000:110:c1bd:4a19:70b7:df4d] (2001:388:1000:110:c1bd:4a19:70b7:df4d) by SG2PR04MB0694.apcprd04.prod.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:520a::20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.20.444.14; Fri, 2 Feb 2018 00:48:28 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\))
From: Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net>
In-Reply-To: <D5D013D4-1EAD-434B-863A-29CB1BBEF4E4@vpnc.org>
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2018 11:48:18 +1100
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <496EFA88-BA70-460B-BFB2-69B2C7BC905D@apnic.net>
References: <CAHw9_iKnD4WtTKyof=nm4ChmDZ5mAPqA7a_-m1t_Lauugf4Uow@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.11.1801251505070.5022@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <CAHw9_iJ-gwC1ZoWQ3YiJraD3eoUf-9-Ay--rPYzy1zWYUzvYmg@mail.gmail.com> <FDCED4D6-A7CE-465B-8344-CA89753ADF19@vpnc.org> <74C0CA59-6D53-4A60-ACBA-4AF5B51FE3FF@apnic.net> <D5D013D4-1EAD-434B-863A-29CB1BBEF4E4@vpnc.org>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.5.20)
X-Originating-IP: [2001:388:1000:110:c1bd:4a19:70b7:df4d]
X-ClientProxiedBy: SG2PR04CA0150.apcprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:1096:3:16::34) To SG2PR04MB0694.apcprd04.prod.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:520a::20)
X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email
X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 32d5a9f6-7398-4c9e-c742-08d569d6ad02
X-Microsoft-Antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(7020095)(4652020)(4534165)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(5600026)(4604075)(2017052603307)(7153060)(7193020); SRVR:SG2PR04MB0694;
X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: 1; SG2PR04MB0694; 3:nHofeIcFmK3i+CMRGIq3z6wOvLz/ybxgpNKVvnua1uIJOIRBcJImuk4mvAPxMXQBeDLzijF4kpLghMynye6NkwY2wh4wp0gjSZQpLSfw5FQDPbHumxpQMHBAmU8blWnXUAwri74hSYgPoCmeXth9emmQA6wCetLUTxMDqmeImWiwwZVophN6LYFDzxFIxDLwJKztEjBNTg3qMPqqbSwxjso+/WLQbCn9xLudYaXKAIc2fJfsnKHeWwf+/GXAyLXb; 25:C08UIhtGZ51EkmWu7xGlIE2IcQC8gVMTEx0/werDeszuVcI2vhTZolsW1gxNbgo7qfuT5EDMHOECy+lAskjgkJ5nrqiMl8VLbG8rWLhkzfWxj++U1ulZ2jOL990u+foblie7vrO6XjYGLMogauCUxr1+tOSIDgFQHLHEyRpRIV7fwcvqCzgFlGb57aBqNpZGdd0XHXelL5Y6ZxxHPiajSQKoNi3Dx8PjLNbyePmxlJ+HXb/59oS+OTvGx4F4U1axnCZqA090eYxg1geG3JN9gsULBfFNZdEAvgYg04VGXQ8Ri0SvTaZhRld/Lo0VeDk4s6w0JYIQzFhXcCzoXxIk+A==; 31:v58zmYd8ZbEPF7bmbPQg6Q/tf+ZdbvfofcaYHx11HfDfxRkEL1eBvvbBETKTC033QM6MTd2ERD3ioyynwwwzjo4CF7pX+MNdX0fCuvQ1vm7Rswvyh23Dt7fwEDsltWZCDR46mlnuu9UjTM59ZfM3NZCyLGx+GwrNtcWDjSRVWp9sKD8aHMzIR2jeQ/Xc2I8kEOT1pP4jK8gyPOLvk2IyNZyn9fTwVkVGOVTVqXBvN14=
X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: SG2PR04MB0694:
X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: <SG2PR04MB06947C00C6792ABC5FDD8C14B8F90@SG2PR04MB0694.apcprd04.prod.outlook.com>
X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-Test: UriScan:(150554046322364);
X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040501)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(10201501046)(3231101)(2400082)(944501161)(3002001)(93006095)(93001095)(6041288)(20161123558120)(20161123560045)(20161123564045)(201703131423095)(201702281528075)(20161123555045)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123562045)(6072148)(201708071742011); SRVR:SG2PR04MB0694; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:SG2PR04MB0694;
X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: 1; SG2PR04MB0694; 4:UE2wU1R/lAwYBLvNrtS5sXFH3x38JpTM7TT/GakQbZwU8kAHmpYv2WPqJH4J96BpXt+O/eWZuTWatOUTYcnk9xvmn6rgGQFGr4+b+Ok8wMVhwANxPVu76B7rs0UyTVpXrHkHvjyCy1fRQhjAVduazMqjUT+xujqkPc+MMSwksrMVLFzaYfKAGHQhNOEmicaX2BdNhU1ZoXO+AK8k9p0DK4MXupDg08HfWYAM94JI35iuCJoSLFI4ekH+pKg7sCFmYUjGOolAEpR0r0UgbgWEHgiaA25SWfhS1Z+76DsHNM1gMniosOVCevdeSsgRU4Gr
X-Forefront-PRVS: 05715BE7FD
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(376002)(396003)(346002)(39380400002)(39840400004)(366004)(189003)(199004)(7736002)(305945005)(68736007)(33656002)(36756003)(47776003)(6486002)(93886005)(229853002)(1706002)(82746002)(97736004)(2906002)(53936002)(6116002)(6916009)(83716003)(2950100002)(386003)(6666003)(25786009)(86362001)(4326008)(5660300001)(16526019)(186003)(2486003)(52146003)(23676004)(52116002)(50466002)(76176011)(6246003)(8676002)(52396003)(106356001)(478600001)(316002)(53546011)(8936002)(57306001)(8746002)(59450400001)(81166006)(81156014)(105586002)(50226002)(42262002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:SG2PR04MB0694; H:[IPv6:2001:388:1000:110:c1bd:4a19:70b7:df4d]; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
Received-SPF: None (protection.outlook.com: apnic.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: 1;SG2PR04MB0694;23: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
X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: 1; SG2PR04MB0694; 6:qKZsy43FgFMZKl0B5TpIgzk5/Exv+Mc6fnerMVa2P3Sgtp+PooT32TDMsAKPVxJFBfcKGuv9gyctv6ukB+NWJZ6c+aJaMTwhMps3K8x5zkZ0V8BpDdvJv8NrErb8kDzgQQGxcUbbQs40obCJ4KGSCxeKcDrtVlyMm1kh7HSPNmAI0FG425ZQgHyz2uoR76LC6tAvDiAZIFxnudALtJs85IkvYmmP3JBkLR5ANOUOdCePoumAJcPxRiauI27Q6EbaIabl1fS9W19u2Jc6CSrIUDuQ8AZpKteyaT833ZaREotdnahcA6mhToOkoMqcPf9+kWG3gl2FEZ26vANe4ucG/N3fTm1x/1GnPJGi6IJ1S5Q=; 5:FeR+RAeRFgcyWUelCCvr00VUp52lQTyG2p3+3HKBxYNxCBqg0ac0mUs1EuCbqtq783psmp1LWYuiONRtEDcdqcgb/qroSTTFihn4Ng6/x2tGmy14nvnY6Oa7ONQcRD/s3Yuqp+LpEIdCy2KnPH3pTU65gK+hpB9ysSuA9wqM3ew=; 24:Yite4SRw/FKmOSwZt24oz1LrhDonh+m6oFADs4DZqpiNWCKUaUAmbb8lUSNeIsCm697rlCtkSO6z+ckqV1xf2ROmBXCE3NTxA18ksHCJZoM=; 7:5boER5wWUVWwBKgIVVIDjno5OphGy8Q7tPONJFlzBn89QAu+paKB5mHQRRNMuBQng4OMo6jxzMyOGdws1Z4NkdcjUQxkPK+MXS8hZnIbTkM4S8e+8cKUWA7jKo14IyWYe2st2P7IGkVm60kwTahwy3cbR+nMTnSSG6LxvR8xGgrdLo9PhotLr/52nQrhX4/a6/NcSNepy6Fa05AnktlSgodxo1D+oq9OruwEcvMuA41WxJ20IXi44XBZDZL7YqGM
SpamDiagnosticOutput: 1:99
SpamDiagnosticMetadata: NSPM
X-OriginatorOrg: apnic.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Feb 2018 00:48:28.5288 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 32d5a9f6-7398-4c9e-c742-08d569d6ad02
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 127d8d0d-7ccf-473d-ab09-6e44ad752ded
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SG2PR04MB0694
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/sG3WFjQ2YSI035d4tdlZObIujF4>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] A conversational description of sentinel.
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2018 00:48:36 -0000

> On 2 Feb 2018, at 7:56 am, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> wrote:
> 
> On 1 Feb 2018, at 12:20, Geoff Huston wrote:
> 
>> What about if the sentinel spec proposes to use a left-most label of the form(s):
>> 
>>    xm—-is-ta-[key]
>> 
>> and
>> 
>>   xm—-not-ta-[key]
>> 
>> 
>> would this form of hostname be a reasonable way forward?
> 
> This was discussed in a different thread in the WG a few days ago, and a few of us had objections and alternate proposals.

I’ve reviewed the (lengthening) thread on this draft, but while I saw posted objections to the use of “xm—" as the initial part of the left-most label here, I did not see any concrete alternate proposals. So on the assumption that I must’ve missed these, could you please resend/remind me of such proposals so that we can use one that we are happy with, and I’ll update the draft accordingly.

thanks,
  Geoff

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email