IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] A conversational description of sentinel.

Petr Špaček <petr.spacek@nic.cz> Tue, 06 February 2018 16:04 UTC

Return-Path: <petr.spacek@nic.cz>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15D9A12E868 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Feb 2018 08:04:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.029
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.029 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nic.cz
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ldKvY6HGKEcx for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Feb 2018 08:04:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.nic.cz (mail.nic.cz [217.31.204.67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E49912E869 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Feb 2018 08:04:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.102.2.165] (cz6.datarail.eu [37.157.195.186]) by mail.nic.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 76758624A7 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Feb 2018 17:04:46 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=nic.cz; s=default; t=1517933086; bh=RVn/RhCiCIq7464MyMi3ne+0LPzWOtJ1yqWfbqCHC5U=; h=To:From:Date; b=puTtiMN6MUAgbKl+cwxdaOIHkrsp7sbuNRf2w3uJN+GAmXd9jWuuCT1MF73dLBtli 30z5dNyPqokWgbjdngMl5r+rT9jH87m7bCny4xrN6z/CkxJAlpJ3ikwL7wuFepEdDO PKbzUO89ibNxhUvR5a0F0sQAMCAH7feF1TAZs2gM=
To: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <CAHw9_iKnD4WtTKyof=nm4ChmDZ5mAPqA7a_-m1t_Lauugf4Uow@mail.gmail.com> <FDCED4D6-A7CE-465B-8344-CA89753ADF19@vpnc.org> <74C0CA59-6D53-4A60-ACBA-4AF5B51FE3FF@apnic.net> <D5D013D4-1EAD-434B-863A-29CB1BBEF4E4@vpnc.org> <496EFA88-BA70-460B-BFB2-69B2C7BC905D@apnic.net> <4540A279-4A37-4245-AE61-BEE5342E3F72@vpnc.org> <20180202075530.Horde.UWaxe9eenZ7PyxWYFHCFGdN@andreasschulze.de> <e8ac7bd0-26e6-cf97-e2ef-0ead50dc18ce@nic.cz> <88E7D27C-048E-44CB-B317-C892EA603D31@isc.org> <0c2a4a38-49d7-2b46-1ac8-1dda0812e217@nic.cz> <CAHw9_iJ6yL12OaGW5+fm8M3YUkrj46CvC2-ob7Xrc5HEaA_Z1Q@mail.gmail.com> <f9861a96-a930-bd08-7cf5-5c6b003f706e@nic.cz> <24C74B01-FC08-41CD-BB16-FD122F9EB61A@apnic.net> <alpine.DEB.2.11.1802051246230.30577@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <FDFE42D8-B805-4336-A9A5-B81F416B3251@apnic.net> <D07FE583-06F7-436D-97EF-4747B815AD3F@vpnc.org> <20180206094215.Horde.m4xt1lsOwvQ28hAbN1r_Tg4@andreasschulze.de> <alpine.DEB.2.11.1802061221510.30577@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
From: Petr Špaček <petr.spacek@nic.cz>
Organization: CZ.NIC
Message-ID: <2ffeba22-5cf1-4eb0-b45c-fefb7cf1d8f7@nic.cz>
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2018 17:04:45 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1802061221510.30577@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.2 at mail
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/uTvknsZggn3pAyO9P4m3M1af0IU>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] A conversational description of sentinel.
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2018 16:04:53 -0000

On 6.2.2018 13:22, Tony Finch wrote:
> A. Schulze <sca@andreasschulze.de> wrote:
>>
>> Yes, "kskroll-sentinel-is-ta-NNNN" is more descriptive and specific.
>> I also prefer that longer variant.
> 
> Yes, more friendly for web searches if someone is wondering about weird
> queries.

Bonus points if we can get a number reserved by RFC editor, it would
allow us to use name like
test-rfc0000-is-ta-NNNN
test-rfc0000-not-ta-NNNN

That would be super awesome.

Is something like RFC number pre-allocation possible?

-- 
Petr Špaček  @  CZ.NIC

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email