Re: [DNSOP] Minimum viable ANAME

Benno Overeinder <benno@NLnetLabs.nl> Thu, 28 March 2019 23:14 UTC

Return-Path: <benno@NLnetLabs.nl>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6AF4120033 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 16:14:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nlnetlabs.nl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oXrkP8ww7cWB for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 16:14:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dicht.nlnetlabs.nl (dicht.nlnetlabs.nl [185.49.140.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 013A3120020 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 16:14:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hydrogen.local (unknown [88.208.109.142]) by dicht.nlnetlabs.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5922C20638; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 00:14:07 +0100 (CET)
Authentication-Results: dicht.nlnetlabs.nl; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=NLnetLabs.nl
Authentication-Results: dicht.nlnetlabs.nl; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=benno@NLnetLabs.nl
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=nlnetlabs.nl; s=default; t=1553814847; bh=x7LxcAZJrA6TE7WMXo6omK9SCzXeHjre/X6N6UeJ4l8=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=TJKMmzEQQmimSg2kx5Hlj0PhkghgnpqWokVR1PURj//JrDq1/rmTLQNmTLBLNPFL8 9fxgxKuPjKNac2lTbbdDK6hzrCFtgNPmXyO/TUspKZgx6kqwyTJTKxWogP2WOXZAk0 sfQoJrdEi5K8NrM1t0V0xuRTMIw+PwvQKqpS7bFo=
To: Dan York <york@isoc.org>, Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com>
Cc: Olli Vanhoja <olli@zeit.co>, Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, Vladimír Čunát <vladimir.cunat@nic.cz>
References: <20180919201401.8E0C220051382A@ary.qy> <08C8A740-D09B-4577-AF2A-79225EDB526B@dotat.at> <20180920061343.GA754@jurassic> <E944887D-51ED-41A0-AC5A-3076743620D8@isoc.org> <acef1f69-8e4f-52cc-dca5-3ada9446e0ee@bellis.me.uk> <CABrJZ5HmCoSsGe2L-JkAsPywhcxyyVkvMmXCvQyJMjWHnMeT_w@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1903261521290.13313@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <104ec4ea-296f-1657-5633-f6c1f2684274@pletterpet.nl> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1903261540330.13313@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <ec8e6848-c962-56b4-50d5-a7bd4b6d48e6@nic.cz> <CABrJZ5H=Ltora2m6_Gyk=O6+UqT-F704hvoKt5=U-TY7fx8JqA@mail.gmail.com> <CAH1iCioQh_dN=cY42p=Y+kPijEiHHt-oGrwpS=8GAyjy+=xUcg@mail.gmail.com> <00A48138-CF24-46BC-A529-CC5C57F2CF65@isoc.org>
From: Benno Overeinder <benno@NLnetLabs.nl>
Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
Message-ID: <d5aff34b-eb77-1187-638f-e5bc863c3f85@NLnetLabs.nl>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 00:14:04 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <00A48138-CF24-46BC-A529-CC5C57F2CF65@isoc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/uso_-M1Hjk7xJCStyViWWh0CF1M>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Minimum viable ANAME
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 23:14:12 -0000

On 26/03/2019 23:49, Dan York wrote:
> As Tim Wicinski mentioned in his review of documents today in DNSOP, this is not a simple problem to solve and there are some fundamental (and passionate) disagreements about the way forward. 
> 
> Tim’s suggestion of an interim (presumably virtual?) to focus specifically on this issue seems to make sense to me.

Given the discussion on the list, the chairs have decided to schedule a
10-15 minute slot at the end of the Friday DNSOP session.

After an overview of the context, Matthijs Mekking will present the
current status of the ANAME draft -02 and (alternative) paths to make
progress at the WG.

See updated agenda on
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/104/materials/agenda-104-dnsop-06

Cheers,

-- Benno