[DNSOP] dns interface to whois? (Re: Taking Back the DNS )

Paul Vixie <vixie@isc.org> Sun, 21 November 2010 17:32 UTC

Return-Path: <vixie@vix.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32C0E3A69F5 for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Nov 2010 09:32:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bOSMzHXo9vzl for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Nov 2010 09:32:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nsa.vix.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:bb:230:48ff:fe5a:2f38]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95DEB3A6A47 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Nov 2010 09:32:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nsa.vix.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nsa.vix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 130E7A1043 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Nov 2010 17:33:12 +0000 (UTC)
From: Paul Vixie <vixie@isc.org>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 21 Nov 2010 07:27:07 PST." <4ce93a4b3be59@circleid.com>
References: <4ce93a4b3be59@circleid.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.2; nmh 1.2; XEmacs 21.4 (patch 22)
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2010 17:33:12 +0000
Message-ID: <41856.1290360792@nsa.vix.com>
Sender: vixie@vix.com
Subject: [DNSOP] dns interface to whois? (Re: Taking Back the DNS )
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2010 17:32:23 -0000

here's something interesting.

> You have just received a comment for:
> 
> Taking Back the DNS
> http://www.circleid.com/posts/20100728_taking_back_the_dns/#7331
> By Marc Perkel
> ...
> Also - I would like to see some sort of DNS lookup to determine the
> age of a domain and the expiration date through DNS (high speed) as
> opposed to whois. That way domains that are very new can be
> distinguished for those who are established. 

how would the registry system implement something like this?  could we
define another SRV-like schema like:

vix._domain._whois._registry.com TXT "admin-c:pv15"
                                 TXT "tech-c:pv15"
                                 TXT "updated:25-Feb-2009"
                                 TXT "created:20-Jun-1995"
                                 TXT "expires:19-Jun-2011"
                                 TXT "registrar:http://tucowsdomains.com"

pv15._contact._whois._registry.com TXT "name:Vixie, Paul"
                                   TXT "email:paul@vix.com"
                                   TXT "postal:Star Route Box 159A, \
                                        Woodside, CA 94062, US"
                                   TXT "pstn:+1.6504231383"

...and then leave it up to each registry (and maybe icann if they are a
regulated registry) to decide whether to implement it and to decide what
kind of rate limiting to perform?

i know there are a lot of related proposals in XML.  that's another topic.