IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] raising the bar: requiring implementations

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Wed, 28 March 2018 15:46 UTC

Return-Path: <dot@dotat.at>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F0B4127369 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 08:46:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MHWjOeDwkvM8 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 08:46:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppsw-31.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-31.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 346AD12420B for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 08:46:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://help.uis.cam.ac.uk/email-scanner-virus
Received: from grey.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.57.57]:47492) by ppsw-31.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.137]:25) with esmtps (TLSv1:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) id 1f1DHo-000MF4-LG (Exim 4.89_2) (return-path <dot@dotat.at>); Wed, 28 Mar 2018 16:46:52 +0100
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 16:46:52 +0100
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
To: bert hubert <bert.hubert@powerdns.com>
cc: Mukund Sivaraman <muks@isc.org>, tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <20180328152433.GB1788@server.ds9a.nl>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1803281636190.10477@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <20180324110756.GE69302@vurt.meerval.net> <9a03dbfb-a4c7-9ca2-22c4-d00a0d0d0223@nlnetlabs.nl> <CADyWQ+G7oR5M9pHgj5Ty+4yL1nsep2mpujLiE7nf__kVmN13fQ@mail.gmail.com> <20180328151939.GA19504@jurassic> <20180328152433.GB1788@server.ds9a.nl>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (DEB 23 2013-08-11)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/zERdpp9-zCQPipSUM8I8AxoCVgc>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] raising the bar: requiring implementations
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 15:46:58 -0000

bert hubert <bert.hubert@powerdns.com> wrote:
>
> Well to allow the one remaining closed source DNS implementation some room,

authoritative services: Akamai Amazon Cloudflare Dyn Google Verisign
recursive services: Google OpenDNS Quad9
COTS: Nominum

 ... I have probably missed several ...

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/  -  I xn--zr8h punycode
Humber, Thames, Dover: Cyclonic becoming west or northwest 5 or 6. Slight or
moderate. Rain then showers. Moderate or poor, becoming good.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email