IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Action: draft-chapin-additional-reserved-tlds-00.txt

Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca> Mon, 03 March 2014 13:22 UTC

Return-Path: <jabley@hopcount.ca>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B9E01A0108 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 05:22:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dierxCWaixCi for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 05:22:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wg0-x22d.google.com (mail-wg0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22d]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BB821A00F5 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 05:22:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wg0-f45.google.com with SMTP id m15so3169602wgh.4 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 05:22:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hopcount.ca; s=google; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=a3Q11mkcdM6lDmkJLx3wxp+VJp4PPc8NRhIp5VrgeV4=; b=fPpA4BM/0b9BcHm9nvGO25AJ/SSFF4cxKHX9OXIZOjtwCSu9CHz0913Crh96zzY00+ NVbmc8xmk//QS97YkkA8UCB5FngzjLoD4XydJpzmxuNu2SNegWsiNenwhb7xK88a3128 l4UAQnT5Q3s9MeGPjkPb5c+45yMUKsiS0KDy0=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to; bh=a3Q11mkcdM6lDmkJLx3wxp+VJp4PPc8NRhIp5VrgeV4=; b=H1Kqf4a0miLXnLJv3IrAhGgBFTP/zpESi7e44hqs7T6xW+zOwh/kvp9j2BncQVbrpI p4vt6bvmCNtXRPCNW2C16k33yHfxmCsv1TaPZOYpNVDPultb7HdaVu/l+vjNtCHC4vpU 6wvsVQxsCCZWjLG/h/JCwnDYXafGNHz3wQk/NYoG6a6BeGwMPebrcm9X1U/qDWazkfNx n8czXCKw1XakpvzMo+EpFdNpg1kO4YNIN0XRdhKvKP7liUjH+kgPDA1+Xfk6RTZecFup 0L+uzWEVRgoWPtFIi+bFlZ20NfVl2KthXQOqd15G7g4fhf80/G3gUqgSL9CwnuEEQEwW uj9A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn6RUoMzcVDHjC5pi26ReDx/iXQ4bhiQEeHNwsWNxH37xLLjKGOCWZZv/k3+u09wbvxCeGJ
X-Received: by 10.194.60.16 with SMTP id d16mr17530332wjr.46.1393852936488; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 05:22:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wireless-v6.meeting.ietf.org ([2001:67c:370:160:95f4:7ccd:b9ca:877c]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id h13sm35397400wjr.22.2014.03.03.05.22.15 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 03 Mar 2014 05:22:15 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
From: Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>
In-Reply-To: <2C463623-6483-45E2-B299-75BF7C8A1A3B@nominum.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 13:22:14 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <9F827B17-4F19-42D8-9A43-D2A9DD28810D@hopcount.ca>
References: <20140129055438.2402.qmail@joyce.lan> <97E20887-2B9C-4EAD-826B-043306605F88@fl1ger.de> <54BE75D7-E70B-46AB-93C1-042E655BB5E7@apple.com> <D0AC0015-63C3-4C03-A8D0-888C435D2775@virtualized.org> <20140226100311.E73CA1069B39@rock.dv.isc.org> <8FEAF0FC-2AC3-4F39-9825-7068AAA6E40D@hopcount.ca> <CAHw9_iJa_OhzHVCQ4L0Aj+m=zAp6w=mJpAV-_ueh9iukhb3bnA@mail.gmail.com> <20140303102535.6f276963@quill> <531450A1.8010507@bogus.com> <917146C3-BC38-4D10-AA14-C3B7A02B1193@hopcount.ca> <2C463623-6483-45E2-B299-75BF7C8A1A3B@nominum.com>
To: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/zUvqZ16jRzYTt_ykOTiwLuJXAhw
Cc: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>, Stuart Cheshire <cheshire@apple.com>, "dnsop@ietf.org WG" <dnsop@ietf.org>, David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>, Norbert Bollow <nb@bollow.ch>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Action: draft-chapin-additional-reserved-tlds-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 13:22:41 -0000

On 3 Mar 2014, at 13:17, Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com> wrote:

> On Mar 3, 2014, at 1:07 PM, Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca> wrote:
>> If we assume that leaks will happen, then they will hit the root servers and there's no opportunity to sink the queries anywhere else.
> 
> This will happen whether the special-domain is under ALT or is itself a TLD.

Ah, but in the case of a delegated ALT TLD, the referral will be cached and hence subsequent/repeated queries will be sunk elsewhere.

>> If we delegate ALT, then we have to decide where to. I can see this being contentious.
> 
> It seems to me that it would be highly preferable not to delegate it.

Me too.

>   Is there an argument for doing so?

See above.


Joe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email