Re: [dtn-interest] Moving I-Ds along or killing 'em...(author response required)

[Daniel Ellard <[e-mail]>]

On 11/15/10 3:32 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> All (or almost all) those DTN related I-Ds are presumably
> intended to become RFCs. There's a big bunch so I want to
> put some manners on the set, in terms of when we plan to
> get done with each.
> 
> I've sorted the on-line list into various states, some of
> which I've just invented but all of which should be obvious
> for anyone familiar with IETF or IRTF processes. The
> full list is below.

> 10. Almost certainly dead (just checking)
> 
> 24-Feb-2010,draft-ellard-dtnrg-reltime-htl

Dead.

I'm not sure which of these is the one that superseded it,
and I want to make sure that someone is pushing forward on
that.  (Dan Brown, who was working on it, has moved on to
other pursuits, and I'm not sure whether he's even on this
list any more)

-Dan

-- 
Daniel Ellard, Ph.D.
Senior Scientist, Network Research
BBN Technologies
10 Moulton Street
Cambridge, MA 02138
[e-mail]