Re: [earlywarning] What problem is ATOCA trying to address?

And to bore everyone again with the same thing: In many cases, notifications are routinely sent to people outside a specific area or beyond a single network. Simple example: The WiFi network in Panera Bread is unlikely to be reachable by single multicast along with the 3GPP network covering that same region, and may even be logically run from some corporate HQ.

Henning

On Mar 26, 2010, at 11:44 AM, Brian Rosen wrote:

> We're not at the mechanism state yet.  While I imagine that the mechanisms
> may include something that is "if you have multicast, use it", I don't think
> that would be enough because multicast is not enabled in way too many
> networks.  Sites like Twitter show us that we can get enough messages sent
> out in reasonable periods of time without multicast.
> 
> Brian
> 
> 
> On 3/26/10 11:34 AM, "Art Botterell" <acb@incident.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Mar 26, 2010, at 3/26/10 6:42 AM, Marc Linsner wrote:
>>> Any IP device, any IP network, any message (not just Fed. Gov't), all under
>>> end-user control (opt-in, opt-out, additional locations, etc.).
>> 
>> So is it possible we're really just revisiting IP multicast?
>> 
>> - Art
>> _______________________________________________
>> earlywarning mailing list
>> earlywarning@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> earlywarning mailing list
> earlywarning@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning
> 