IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [earlywarning] What problem is ATOCA trying to address?

Art Botterell <acb@incident.com> Fri, 26 March 2010 15:34 UTC

Return-Path: <acb@incident.com>
X-Original-To: earlywarning@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: earlywarning@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B56163A691C for <earlywarning@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:34:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.185, BAYES_20=-0.74, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e7j5kE+2ISR9 for <earlywarning@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:34:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp126.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com (smtp126.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com [69.147.65.185]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 237303A6868 for <earlywarning@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:34:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 26854 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2010 15:34:55 -0000
Received: from 99-182-125-96.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net (acb@99.182.125.96 with login) by smtp126.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 26 Mar 2010 08:34:55 -0700 PDT
X-Yahoo-SMTP: c09pd_2swBAlwYa9BknTHpHNRHUh4Oco4AeV8DAru96p
X-YMail-OSG: XFuXtccVM1npIssN1Hc8UvhxSoFKmvenT_MquHun3nh4hk9mCkB6.YjCTHrobjIrPDhARtsxfYqXBk58SHycXWFhzQzgnSLQGjql1FWpK0f7J68f4g_qwpy0etdZgPI0fCCYJi8mPOAzhnL2RnSFu1oE8zmthVFY6LqfKhi1OlJ54CYUmy.KkhQT8xtNKkdRIopYvpeFjbTCDosExazX7SMynDYukURMmS23XoO8zRxWh7r_cq_e3AzcLoDiCh6U
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by postfix.incident.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82A342945DCE for <earlywarning@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:34:53 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077)
From: Art Botterell <acb@incident.com>
In-Reply-To: <C7D23223.22855%mlinsner@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:34:52 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <EB0E9151-20A6-4576-AFE7-CEDE3FFEF79A@incident.com>
References: <C7D23223.22855%mlinsner@cisco.com>
To: earlywarning@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077)
Subject: Re: [earlywarning] What problem is ATOCA trying to address?
X-BeenThere: earlywarning@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for Authority-to-Individuals \(Early Warning\) Emergency " <earlywarning.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning>, <mailto:earlywarning-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/earlywarning>
List-Post: <mailto:earlywarning@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:earlywarning-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning>, <mailto:earlywarning-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:34:34 -0000

On Mar 26, 2010, at 3/26/10 6:42 AM, Marc Linsner wrote:
> Any IP device, any IP network, any message (not just Fed. Gov't), all under
> end-user control (opt-in, opt-out, additional locations, etc.).

So is it possible we're really just revisiting IP multicast?

- Art

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email